Dave Beckett wrote: > On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 9:50 PM, Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com> wrote: >> Just to be pedantic and hammer this one more time - please please please >> remember that XHTML+RDFa does not permit the use if xml:base. XHTML >> Modularization >> does not include xml:base, so neither does any language that uses it. > > I was quoting Manu's code: > [[ > // TODO: 2.1 The [current element] is parsed for xml:base and [base] is set > // to this value if it exists. -- manu (not in the processing rules > // yet) > ]] Oh, how embarrassing... =P Removed that comment and the code attached to it, committed to GIT (new version is available): git clone http://rdfa.digitalbazaar.com/librdfa.git librdfa hasn't payed attention to xml:base for some time, but I did also find a bug that caused librdfa to process multiple <base> elements outside of <head>, which has also been fixed in the code above. -- manu -- Manu Sporny President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: Dynamic Spectrum Auctions and Digital Marketplaces http://blog.digitalbazaar.com/2008/04/24/dynamic-spectrum-auctions/Received on Tuesday, 13 May 2008 22:28:27 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 13 May 2008 22:28:28 GMT