W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > May 2008

following up on ISSUE-109, @cite

From: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 19:20:07 -0700
Message-ID: <483386D7.1060006@adida.net>
To: Laurens Holst <lholst@students.cs.uu.nl>
CC: RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>


I wanted to check in with you regarding our resolution of ISSUE-109:


Specifically, here's our resolution text:

"We considered @cite but realized that many other attributes would then 
require RDFa interpretation and that doing so is not simple. We defer 
this issue to a future version of RDFa."

Is this acceptable from your point of view?

Received on Wednesday, 21 May 2008 02:20:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:50:28 UTC