following up on ISSUE-109, @cite

Laurens,

I wanted to check in with you regarding our resolution of ISSUE-109:

http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/109

Specifically, here's our resolution text:

"We considered @cite but realized that many other attributes would then 
require RDFa interpretation and that doing so is not simple. We defer 
this issue to a future version of RDFa."

Is this acceptable from your point of view?

-Ben