Ben Adida wrote: > My interpretation of the spec is that rel="myfoobarrel" is completely > ignored, meaning that the triple completion behaves as if there was no > @rel on the img, which means that <ben.jpg> indeed completes > dc:creator. And I think that's a bad outcome. > > Instead, I think the *presence* of @rel, no matter what it contains, > should cause completion of the incomplete triples. Then, once the > triples are completed, the *contents* of the @rel are considered for > new triple creation. > > Consider what would happen if you had a different @rel: > > <div about="" rel="dc:creator"> > <img rel="foaf:img" href="ben.jpg" /> > </div> > > which would then yield: > > <> dc:creator _:bnode1 . > _:bnode1 foaf:img <ben.jpg> . > > Changing the @rel value on img should certainly kill the second > triple, but I don't see why it should change the first triple at all. I agree with this conclusion. -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.comReceived on Friday, 9 May 2008 02:54:39 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 9 May 2008 02:54:40 GMT