W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > May 2008

Re: Silly Question - do we need to explicitly say what to do with illegal URIs?

From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Date: Sun, 11 May 2008 23:19:46 +0900
Cc: "public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf.w3.org" <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Message-Id: <288C8B89-972F-45EA-80B2-87983E0925E1@w3.org>
To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com> 


Le 10 mai 2008 à 01:03, Shane McCarron a écrit :
> I am not a fan of attempting to identify every pathological case and  
> define error behavior.

I recommend the reading of this excellent paper of Thierry Kormann at  
the QA Workshop of 2001.
http://www.w3.org/2001/01/qa-ws/pp/thierry-kormann-ilog.htm

And if not read yet. It is really worth reading and might help you to  
make the right decision.

* QA Framework: Specification Guidelines
   http://www.w3.org/TR/qaframe-spec/
* Variability in Specifications
   http://www.w3.org/TR/spec-variability/

-- 
Karl Dubost - W3C
http://www.w3.org/QA/
Be Strict To Be Cool
Received on Sunday, 11 May 2008 14:20:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 11 May 2008 14:20:22 GMT