Re: telecon

One other thing to consider in this vein.

If there's a hanging triple that never gets completed, does it make sense to
go ahead and treat it as completed by a blank node?

For example this:
<div rel=²foaf:maker² xmlns:foaf=²...²/>

Clearly this is stating that the document has a maker, but we don't know
anything about him/her/it. That there is no interior @rel/@rev/@property
shouldn't fundamentally change anything. (right?)

Is this the same as the 'useless' triples discussion, except only one level
deep?

-m



On 5/28/08 9:07 PM, "Ben Adida" <ben@adida.net> wrote:

> ISSUE-120
> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/120
> 
> which I believe we resolved over email.
> 
>