W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > May 2008

Re: ISSUE-103: substantive issue that requires opinion + discussion

From: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 08:56:49 -0700
Message-ID: <ed77aa9f0805290856g5c2d475fn4c81cc0aeeae3689@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Ralph R. Swick" <swick@w3.org>
Cc: "Manu Sporny" <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>

Hi Ralph,

> At 10:33 AM 5/27/2008 -0400, Manu Sporny wrote:
>>If we were to start from scratch, it would've been nice to adopt
>>"curie:foo:bar" and that's probably what would've happened.
> naw.  If we were to start from scratch, we'd make XML accept
> '<' and '>' in attribute values and we'd define the URIREF type
> to require those, so we'd have
>  href="<http://www.w3.org/RDF/>" for a full URI
> and
>  href="w3:/RDF/" for an abbreviated URI

Right. :)

And also we should remember that one of the initial design goals was
to ensure that languages that currently use QNames can move smoothly
to CURIEs.

For example, XForms uses QNames to identify appearance values, like so:

  <xf:range ref="x" appearance="geo:map">

Future versions of XForms could move to CURIEs without invalidating
existing documents.



Mark Birbeck, webBackplane



webBackplane is a trading name of Backplane Ltd. (company number
05972288, registered office: 2nd Floor, 69/85 Tabernacle Street,
London, EC2A 4RR)
Received on Thursday, 29 May 2008 15:57:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:50:28 UTC