W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > May 2008

Re: ISSUE-103: substantive issue that requires opinion + discussion

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 16:37:24 +0100
Message-ID: <483ECDB4.9000701@danbri.org>
To: "Ralph R. Swick" <swick@w3.org>
Cc: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>

Ralph R. Swick wrote:
> At 10:33 AM 5/27/2008 -0400, Manu Sporny wrote:
>> If we were to start from scratch, it would've been nice to adopt
>> "curie:foo:bar" and that's probably what would've happened.
> 
> naw.  If we were to start from scratch, we'd make XML accept
> '<' and '>' in attribute values and we'd define the URIREF type
> to require those, so we'd have
> 
>   href="<http://www.w3.org/RDF/>" for a full URI
> 
> and
> 
>   href="w3:/RDF/" for an abbreviated URI

Talking of time-travel... hmmm, did 
http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-pics-ng-metadata support a CURIE-like 
notation? Not obvious from a quick skim...

Dan

--
http://danbri.org/
Received on Thursday, 29 May 2008 15:38:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 29 May 2008 15:38:10 GMT