W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > May 2008

Re: TC#88: Interpretation of _: CURIE

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 22:00:06 +0200
Message-ID: <48308AC6.5060102@w3.org>
To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Cc: RDFa mailing list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
'_:' is _a_ BNode. Ie: there _one_ BNode (within the RDF Graph generated 
for that HTML file, of course) that is identified by '_:'. This can be 
deduced from the wording of the CURIE specification (maybe a more 
explicit note would be welcome, though...)

The alternative that was discussed was that each occurrence of '_:' 
would generate a _new_ BNode (a bit like using the '[' character in 
turtle). This alternative was rejected.


Manu Sporny wrote:
> I can't find anything in either the RDFa Syntax Document or the CURIE
> Syntax spec that explicitly states what the proper interpretation of the
> _: CURIE should be...
> Can't seem to remember what we had settled on... just want to know if
> TC#88 is correct or not.
> Reading the RDFa Syntax Document literally, I'm interpreting _: to mean
> "the first bnode that is generated"?
> -- manu


Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf

Received on Sunday, 18 May 2008 20:00:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:50:28 UTC