Saturday, 27 February 2010
Friday, 26 February 2010
- [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2010-02-24
 - Re: css3-background: grammar issue
 - Re: vendor prefix properties diverging from official properties
 - Re: [css3-background] grammar issue
 - Re: vendor prefix properties diverging from official properties
 - Re: vendor prefix properties diverging from official properties
 - Re: [css3-background] grammar issue
 - Re: [css3-background] grammar issue
 - Re: [css3-background] grammar issue
 - Re: Specificity of :any (was Re: [css3-selectors] Grouping)
 - Re: Specificity of :any (was Re: [css3-selectors] Grouping)
 - Re: Specificity of :any (was Re: [css3-selectors] Grouping)
 - Re: Specificity of :any (was Re: [css3-selectors] Grouping)
 - Re: [css3-fonts] Please add font-variant-caps: all-small-caps and all-petite-caps
 - RE: vendor prefix properties diverging from official properties
 - Re: [css3-fonts] Please add font-variant-caps: all-small-caps and all-petite-caps
 - [css3-fonts] Please add font-variant-caps: all-small-caps and all-petite-caps
 - Re: [css3-fonts] opentype font feature support
 - Re: vendor prefix properties diverging from official properties
 - Re: [css3-fonts] opentype font feature support
 - Re: [css3-fonts] opentype font feature support
 - Re: [css3-fonts] opentype font feature support
 - Re: Specificity of :any (was Re: [css3-selectors] Grouping)
 - Re: [css3-fonts] font-specific feature handling
 - Re: [css3-fonts] font-specific feature handling
 - Re: Specificity of :any (was Re: [css3-selectors] Grouping)
 
Thursday, 25 February 2010
- Re: Specificity of :any (was Re: [css3-selectors] Grouping)
 - Re: [css3-fonts] opentype font feature support
 - Re: Specificity of :any (was Re: [css3-selectors] Grouping)
 - Re: [css3-background] grammar issue
 - Re: [css3-fonts] font-specific feature handling
 - Re: Specificity of :any (was Re: [css3-selectors] Grouping)
 - Specificity of :any (was Re: [css3-selectors] Grouping)
 - Re: [css3-selectors] Grouping
 - Re: [css3-selectors] Grouping
 - Re: [css3-fonts] font-specific feature handling
 - Re: [css3-background] grammar issue
 - Re: [css3-fonts] font-specific feature handling
 - RE: vendor prefix properties diverging from official properties
 - Re: [css3-background] border-radius color transitions using gradients recommended but undefined
 - Re: [css3-fonts] font-specific feature handling
 - RE: [css3-background] border-radius color transitions using gradients recommended but undefined
 - Re: [css3-fonts] font-specific feature handling
 - Re: [css3-fonts] font-specific feature handling
 - Re: [css3-fonts] font-specific feature handling
 - image-fit: none in szilles's meeting minutes
 - Re: vendor prefix properties diverging from official properties
 - Re: [css3-background] border-radius color transitions using gradients recommended but undefined
 - Re: [css3-fonts] OpenType subscript/superscript support
 - Re: [css3-fonts] font-specific feature handling
 - [css3-fonts] OpenType subscript/superscript support
 - [css3-fonts] font-specific feature handling
 - [css3-fonts] opentype font feature support
 - Specification deliverables for FX Task Force work on 2D/3D Transforms
 - RE: [css3-background] border-radius color transitions using gradients recommended but undefined
 - RE: vendor prefix properties diverging from official properties
 - Re: vendor prefix properties diverging from official properties
 - Re: [css3-background] border-radius color transitions using gradients recommended but undefined
 - RE: vendor prefix properties diverging from official properties
 - RE: [css3-background] border-radius color transitions using gradients recommended but undefined
 - vendor prefix properties diverging from official properties
 - Re: [css3-background] border-radius color transitions using gradients recommended but undefined
 
Wednesday, 24 February 2010
- Re: [css3-background] border-radius color transitions using gradients recommended but undefined
 - Re: [css3-background] border-radius color transitions using gradients recommended but undefined
 - RE: [css3-background] border-radius color transitions using gradients recommended but undefined
 - Re: [css3-background] background-repeat über-nit
 - Re: [css3-background] PFWG review of css3-background 2009-10-15 LCWD
 - Re: [css3-background] PFWG review of css3-background 2009-10-15 LCWD
 - Re: [css3-background] border-radius color transitions using gradients recommended but undefined
 - [css3-background] background-repeat über-nit
 - RE: [css3-background] border-radius color transitions using gradients recommended but undefined
 - Re: [css3-background] border-radius color transitions using gradients recommended but undefined
 - [css3-page] @page margin_box rule inconsistency
 - RE: [css3-background] border-radius color transitions using gradients recommended but undefined
 - Proposed revision of CSS2.1 description of backslash escapes
 - Re: [css3-background] border-radius color transitions using gradients recommended but undefined
 - Re: [css3-background] border-radius color transitions using gradients recommended but undefined
 
Tuesday, 23 February 2010
- Re: [transitions/animations] stepped timing function proposal
 - Re: [transitions/animations] stepped timing function proposal
 - Re: [transitions/animations] stepped timing function proposal
 - RE: [css3-background] border-radius color transitions using gradients recommended but undefined
 - Re: [transitions/animations] stepped timing function proposal
 - Re: [css3-background] border-radius color transitions using gradients recommended but undefined
 - Re: [transitions/animations] stepped timing function proposal
 - RE: [css3-background] border-radius color transitions using gradients recommended but undefined
 - [CSS2.1] Behavior for invalid \-newline in the middle of an identifier
 - Re: [css3-background] border-radius color transitions using gradients recommended but undefined
 - Re: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2010-02-17
 - Re: [css-style-attr] inline style term
 - Re: css3-background: grammar issue
 - Re: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2010-02-17
 - Re: Question about inline layout and margins
 - Re: css3-background: grammar issue
 - Re: Question about inline layout and margins
 - Re: css3-background: grammar issue
 - Question about inline layout and margins
 - Re: css3-background: grammar issue
 - Re: css3-background: grammar issue
 - Re: [css-style-attr] Cascade clarification
 - Re: [css-style-attr] inline style term
 - Re: css3-background: grammar issue
 - Re: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2010-02-17
 - Re: [css-style-attr] SVG WG comments on CSS Styling Attributes Level 1
 - Re: [css-style-attr] SVG WG comments on CSS Styling Attributes Level 1
 - Re: [css-style-attr] SVG WG comments on CSS Styling Attributes Level 1
 - Re: [css3-page] Proposal: Making variable page area widths in a document optional
 - RE: [css3-background] border-radius color transitions using gradients recommended but undefined
 - Re: [css-style-attr] Cascade clarification
 - Re: [css-style-attr] inline style term
 - Re: [css3-background] border-radius color transitions using gradients recommended but undefined
 - Re: css3-background: grammar issue
 
Monday, 22 February 2010
- Re: [css3-page] Proposal: Making variable page area widths in a document optional
 - Re: [CSS21] Proposal for a replacement for section 17.2.1 (table anonymous objects)
 - RE: [css3-page] Proposal: Making variable page area widths in a document optional
 - Re: [CSS21] Proposal for a replacement for section 17.2.1 (table anonymous objects)
 - Re: [css3-page] Proposal: Making variable page area widths in a document optional
 - Re: Counter mechanism on boxes or elements?
 - Re: Counter mechanism on boxes or elements?
 - Re: Counter mechanism on boxes or elements?
 - Re: Counter mechanism on boxes or elements?
 - [css3-page] Proposal: Making variable page area widths in a document optional
 - Counter mechanism on boxes or elements?
 
Friday, 19 February 2010
Thursday, 18 February 2010
- Re: Scientific notation in numbers
 - Re: [css3-values] Adding min() and max() into calc() grammar
 - Re: [cssom] comments on value serialization rules
 - Re: [cssom] comments on value serialization rules
 - Re: css3-background: grammar issue
 - Re: Feedback on 'image-fit' and 'image-position'
 - Re: Feedback on 'image-fit' and 'image-position'
 
Wednesday, 17 February 2010
- Re: Feedback on 'image-fit' and 'image-position'
 - [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2010-02-17
 - [cssom] comments on value serialization rules
 - Re: [css3-values] Adding min() and max() into calc() grammar
 - RE: [css3-lists] East Asian numbering list styles: corrections and proposals
 - Re: [css3-values] Adding min() and max() into calc() grammar
 - Re: css3-background: grammar issue
 - Re: css3-background: grammar issue
 - Re: [css21] ident production does not match <identifier>
 - Re: [css21] ident production does not match <identifier>
 - Re: [css3-lists] East Asian numbering list styles: corrections and proposals
 - FW: [css3-lists] East Asian numbering list styles: corrections and proposals
 - Re: [css2.1] Content of a string containing a backslash followed immediately by EOF
 
Tuesday, 16 February 2010
- Re: [css2.1] Content of a string containing a backslash followed immediately by EOF
 - [css2.1] Content of a string containing a backslash followed immediately by EOF
 - Re: [cssom] serializing <color>
 - Re: [cssom] serializing <color>
 - Re: [cssom] serializing <color>
 - Re: [cssom] serializing <color>
 - Re: [cssom] serializing <color>
 - Re: [cssom] serializing <color>
 - Re: [cssom] serializing <color>
 - Re: [cssom] serializing <color>
 - Re: [cssom] serializing <color>
 - Re: [cssom] serializing <color>
 - Re: [cssom] serializing <color>
 - Re: Scientific notation in numbers
 - Re: Scientific notation in numbers
 - Re: Feedback on 'image-fit' and 'image-position'
 - Re: [css21] ident production does not match <identifier>
 - Re: [cssom] serializing <color>
 - Re: CSS/SVG FX taskforce telcon
 - Re: CSS/SVG FX taskforce telcon
 
Monday, 15 February 2010
- Width/Height for css3-content
 - Re: [cssom] serializing <color>
 - Re: [css21] ident production does not match <identifier>
 - Re: [CSS21] Incorrect link
 - Re: [css21] ident production does not match <identifier>
 - Re: [CSSOM] issues with cssText and selectorText
 - Re: [css21] ident production does not match <identifier>
 - Re: [css21] ident production does not match <identifier>
 - Re: [css21] ident production does not match <identifier>
 - Re: [css21] ident production does not match <identifier>
 - Re: [css21] ident production does not match <identifier>
 - Re: [cssom] serializing <color>
 - Re: [CSSOM] issues with cssText and selectorText
 - [css21] ident production does not match <identifier>
 - Re: [cssom] serializing <color>
 - Re: [cssom] serializing <color>
 - [cssom] serializing <color>
 - CSS/SVG FX taskforce telcon
 
Sunday, 14 February 2010
Saturday, 13 February 2010
Friday, 12 February 2010
- Re: collapsible property
 - RE: Scientific notation in numbers
 - RE: [cssom] Defining getComputedStyle
 - Re: [cssom] Defining getComputedStyle
 - Re: collapsible property
 - RE: [cssom] Defining getComputedStyle
 - Re: [cssom] Defining getComputedStyle
 - Re: [css21] height/width computed value is wrong
 - Re: collapsible property
 - Re: collapsible property
 - Re: collapsible property
 - Re: collapsible property
 - Re: collapsible property
 - Re: collapsible property
 
Thursday, 11 February 2010
- Re: [cssom] Defining getComputedStyle
 - Re: CSS Transitions and height:auto
 - RE: Scientific notation in numbers
 - Re: [css21] height/width computed value is wrong
 - RE: Scientific notation in numbers
 - Re: [cssom] Defining getComputedStyle
 - Re: [css21] computed value of letter-spacing vs word-spacing
 - Re: [cssom] Defining getComputedStyle
 - Re: [css21] computed value of letter-spacing vs word-spacing
 - Re: [cssom] Defining getComputedStyle
 - Re: [css21] computed value of letter-spacing vs word-spacing
 - Re: [css21] computed value of letter-spacing vs word-spacing
 - Re: [cssom] Defining getComputedStyle
 - Re: [cssom] Defining getComputedStyle
 - RE: Scientific notation in numbers
 - Re: [cssom] Defining getComputedStyle
 - [css21] height/width computed value is wrong
 - Re: CSS Transitions and height:auto
 - Re: Scientific notation in numbers
 - CSS Transitions and height:auto
 - [css21] computed value of letter-spacing vs word-spacing
 - [CSS21] Incorrect link
 - Re: collapsible property
 - Re: Please let me know about these warnings
 - Re: collapsible property
 - Re: [CSSOM] getClientRects should work on collapsed ranges in elements
 - Re: collapsible property
 - Re: collapsible property
 - Re: collapsible property
 - Re: collapsible property
 - Re: collapsible property
 - RE: Scientific notation in numbers
 - Re: collapsible property
 - Re: collapsible property
 - [CSSOM] getClientRects should work on collapsed ranges in elements
 - collapsible property
 - Re: Scientific notation in numbers
 
Wednesday, 10 February 2010
- Re: Scientific notation in numbers
 - Re: Scientific notation in numbers
 - Re: Scientific notation in numbers
 - [CSS2.1] Numbers don't allow signs in formal grammar, do in prose
 - Re: Scientific notation in numbers
 - Re: Scientific notation in numbers
 - Re: Scientific notation in numbers
 - Re: Scientific notation in numbers
 - Re: Scientific notation in numbers
 - Re: Scientific notation in numbers
 - Re: [css-style-attr] SVG WG comments on CSS Styling Attributes Level 1
 - Re: Scientific notation in numbers
 - Re: Scientific notation in numbers
 - Re: Scientific notation in numbers
 - Scientific notation in numbers
 - [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2010-02-10
 - [css21] "Applies to:"
 - Re: [css-style-attr] SVG WG comments on CSS Styling Attributes Level 1
 
Tuesday, 9 February 2010
- [css-style-attr] SVG WG comments on CSS Styling Attributes Level 1
 - Re: [CSS3] @font vs @background
 - Re: text-align:justify, inline-blocks, and MS test inline-formatting-context-019.xht
 - Re: text-align:justify, inline-blocks, and MS test inline-formatting-context-019.xht
 - text-align:justify, inline-blocks, and MS test inline-formatting-context-019.xht
 - Re: [CSS 3] Transform on Complete Event
 - Re: [CSS 3] Transform on Complete Event
 
Monday, 8 February 2010
- RE: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2010-01-27
 - Re: [CSS 3] Transform on Complete Event
 - RE: [CSS3] @font vs @background
 
Sunday, 7 February 2010
- [CSS 3] Transform on Complete Event
 - Re: [CSS3] @font vs @background
 - Re: [CSS3] @font vs @background
 - RE: [CSS3] @font vs @background
 
Saturday, 6 February 2010
- Re: [CSS3] @font vs @background
 - RE: [CSS3] @font vs @background
 - Re: [CSS3] @font vs @background
 - RE: [CSS3] @font vs @background
 
Friday, 5 February 2010
- Re: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2010-01-27
 - Re: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2010-01-27
 - [CSS3] @font vs @background
 
Thursday, 4 February 2010
- [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2010-01-27
 - [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2010-02-03
 - Re: [CSSOM] issues with cssText and selectorText
 - Re: Ruby proposal for XSL 2.0 (batch2)
 - Re: [CSS21] 8.3.1 margin-bottom of 'collapsed through' box with clearance applied
 
Wednesday, 3 February 2010
- Re: [CSS21] 8.3.1 margin-bottom of 'collapsed through' box with clearance applied
 - [CSS21] 8.3.1 margin-bottom of 'collapsed through' box with clearance applied
 - RE: [cssom] Defining getComputedStyle
 - Re: [cssom] Defining getComputedStyle
 - Re: [cssom] Defining getComputedStyle
 - Re: [cssom] Defining getComputedStyle
 - RE: [cssom] Defining getComputedStyle
 - Re: [CSSOM] issues with cssText and selectorText
 - Re: [CSSOM] issues with cssText and selectorText
 - [CSSOM] issues with cssText and selectorText
 - Re: [cssom] Defining getComputedStyle
 - [cssom] Defining getComputedStyle