Saturday, 27 February 2010
Friday, 26 February 2010
- [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2010-02-24
- Re: css3-background: grammar issue
- Re: vendor prefix properties diverging from official properties
- Re: [css3-background] grammar issue
- Re: vendor prefix properties diverging from official properties
- Re: vendor prefix properties diverging from official properties
- Re: [css3-background] grammar issue
- Re: [css3-background] grammar issue
- Re: [css3-background] grammar issue
- Re: Specificity of :any (was Re: [css3-selectors] Grouping)
- Re: Specificity of :any (was Re: [css3-selectors] Grouping)
- Re: Specificity of :any (was Re: [css3-selectors] Grouping)
- Re: Specificity of :any (was Re: [css3-selectors] Grouping)
- Re: [css3-fonts] Please add font-variant-caps: all-small-caps and all-petite-caps
- RE: vendor prefix properties diverging from official properties
- Re: [css3-fonts] Please add font-variant-caps: all-small-caps and all-petite-caps
- [css3-fonts] Please add font-variant-caps: all-small-caps and all-petite-caps
- Re: [css3-fonts] opentype font feature support
- Re: vendor prefix properties diverging from official properties
- Re: [css3-fonts] opentype font feature support
- Re: [css3-fonts] opentype font feature support
- Re: [css3-fonts] opentype font feature support
- Re: Specificity of :any (was Re: [css3-selectors] Grouping)
- Re: [css3-fonts] font-specific feature handling
- Re: [css3-fonts] font-specific feature handling
- Re: Specificity of :any (was Re: [css3-selectors] Grouping)
Thursday, 25 February 2010
- Re: Specificity of :any (was Re: [css3-selectors] Grouping)
- Re: [css3-fonts] opentype font feature support
- Re: Specificity of :any (was Re: [css3-selectors] Grouping)
- Re: [css3-background] grammar issue
- Re: [css3-fonts] font-specific feature handling
- Re: Specificity of :any (was Re: [css3-selectors] Grouping)
- Specificity of :any (was Re: [css3-selectors] Grouping)
- Re: [css3-selectors] Grouping
- Re: [css3-selectors] Grouping
- Re: [css3-fonts] font-specific feature handling
- Re: [css3-background] grammar issue
- Re: [css3-fonts] font-specific feature handling
- RE: vendor prefix properties diverging from official properties
- Re: [css3-background] border-radius color transitions using gradients recommended but undefined
- Re: [css3-fonts] font-specific feature handling
- RE: [css3-background] border-radius color transitions using gradients recommended but undefined
- Re: [css3-fonts] font-specific feature handling
- Re: [css3-fonts] font-specific feature handling
- Re: [css3-fonts] font-specific feature handling
- image-fit: none in szilles's meeting minutes
- Re: vendor prefix properties diverging from official properties
- Re: [css3-background] border-radius color transitions using gradients recommended but undefined
- Re: [css3-fonts] OpenType subscript/superscript support
- Re: [css3-fonts] font-specific feature handling
- [css3-fonts] OpenType subscript/superscript support
- [css3-fonts] font-specific feature handling
- [css3-fonts] opentype font feature support
- Specification deliverables for FX Task Force work on 2D/3D Transforms
- RE: [css3-background] border-radius color transitions using gradients recommended but undefined
- RE: vendor prefix properties diverging from official properties
- Re: vendor prefix properties diverging from official properties
- Re: [css3-background] border-radius color transitions using gradients recommended but undefined
- RE: vendor prefix properties diverging from official properties
- RE: [css3-background] border-radius color transitions using gradients recommended but undefined
- vendor prefix properties diverging from official properties
- Re: [css3-background] border-radius color transitions using gradients recommended but undefined
Wednesday, 24 February 2010
- Re: [css3-background] border-radius color transitions using gradients recommended but undefined
- Re: [css3-background] border-radius color transitions using gradients recommended but undefined
- RE: [css3-background] border-radius color transitions using gradients recommended but undefined
- Re: [css3-background] background-repeat über-nit
- Re: [css3-background] PFWG review of css3-background 2009-10-15 LCWD
- Re: [css3-background] PFWG review of css3-background 2009-10-15 LCWD
- Re: [css3-background] border-radius color transitions using gradients recommended but undefined
- [css3-background] background-repeat über-nit
- RE: [css3-background] border-radius color transitions using gradients recommended but undefined
- Re: [css3-background] border-radius color transitions using gradients recommended but undefined
- [css3-page] @page margin_box rule inconsistency
- RE: [css3-background] border-radius color transitions using gradients recommended but undefined
- Proposed revision of CSS2.1 description of backslash escapes
- Re: [css3-background] border-radius color transitions using gradients recommended but undefined
- Re: [css3-background] border-radius color transitions using gradients recommended but undefined
Tuesday, 23 February 2010
- Re: [transitions/animations] stepped timing function proposal
- Re: [transitions/animations] stepped timing function proposal
- Re: [transitions/animations] stepped timing function proposal
- RE: [css3-background] border-radius color transitions using gradients recommended but undefined
- Re: [transitions/animations] stepped timing function proposal
- Re: [css3-background] border-radius color transitions using gradients recommended but undefined
- Re: [transitions/animations] stepped timing function proposal
- RE: [css3-background] border-radius color transitions using gradients recommended but undefined
- [CSS2.1] Behavior for invalid \-newline in the middle of an identifier
- Re: [css3-background] border-radius color transitions using gradients recommended but undefined
- Re: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2010-02-17
- Re: [css-style-attr] inline style term
- Re: css3-background: grammar issue
- Re: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2010-02-17
- Re: Question about inline layout and margins
- Re: css3-background: grammar issue
- Re: Question about inline layout and margins
- Re: css3-background: grammar issue
- Question about inline layout and margins
- Re: css3-background: grammar issue
- Re: css3-background: grammar issue
- Re: [css-style-attr] Cascade clarification
- Re: [css-style-attr] inline style term
- Re: css3-background: grammar issue
- Re: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2010-02-17
- Re: [css-style-attr] SVG WG comments on CSS Styling Attributes Level 1
- Re: [css-style-attr] SVG WG comments on CSS Styling Attributes Level 1
- Re: [css-style-attr] SVG WG comments on CSS Styling Attributes Level 1
- Re: [css3-page] Proposal: Making variable page area widths in a document optional
- RE: [css3-background] border-radius color transitions using gradients recommended but undefined
- Re: [css-style-attr] Cascade clarification
- Re: [css-style-attr] inline style term
- Re: [css3-background] border-radius color transitions using gradients recommended but undefined
- Re: css3-background: grammar issue
Monday, 22 February 2010
- Re: [css3-page] Proposal: Making variable page area widths in a document optional
- Re: [CSS21] Proposal for a replacement for section 17.2.1 (table anonymous objects)
- RE: [css3-page] Proposal: Making variable page area widths in a document optional
- Re: [CSS21] Proposal for a replacement for section 17.2.1 (table anonymous objects)
- Re: [css3-page] Proposal: Making variable page area widths in a document optional
- Re: Counter mechanism on boxes or elements?
- Re: Counter mechanism on boxes or elements?
- Re: Counter mechanism on boxes or elements?
- Re: Counter mechanism on boxes or elements?
- [css3-page] Proposal: Making variable page area widths in a document optional
- Counter mechanism on boxes or elements?
Friday, 19 February 2010
Thursday, 18 February 2010
- Re: Scientific notation in numbers
- Re: [css3-values] Adding min() and max() into calc() grammar
- Re: [cssom] comments on value serialization rules
- Re: [cssom] comments on value serialization rules
- Re: css3-background: grammar issue
- Re: Feedback on 'image-fit' and 'image-position'
- Re: Feedback on 'image-fit' and 'image-position'
Wednesday, 17 February 2010
- Re: Feedback on 'image-fit' and 'image-position'
- [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2010-02-17
- [cssom] comments on value serialization rules
- Re: [css3-values] Adding min() and max() into calc() grammar
- RE: [css3-lists] East Asian numbering list styles: corrections and proposals
- Re: [css3-values] Adding min() and max() into calc() grammar
- Re: css3-background: grammar issue
- Re: css3-background: grammar issue
- Re: [css21] ident production does not match <identifier>
- Re: [css21] ident production does not match <identifier>
- Re: [css3-lists] East Asian numbering list styles: corrections and proposals
- FW: [css3-lists] East Asian numbering list styles: corrections and proposals
- Re: [css2.1] Content of a string containing a backslash followed immediately by EOF
Tuesday, 16 February 2010
- Re: [css2.1] Content of a string containing a backslash followed immediately by EOF
- [css2.1] Content of a string containing a backslash followed immediately by EOF
- Re: [cssom] serializing <color>
- Re: [cssom] serializing <color>
- Re: [cssom] serializing <color>
- Re: [cssom] serializing <color>
- Re: [cssom] serializing <color>
- Re: [cssom] serializing <color>
- Re: [cssom] serializing <color>
- Re: [cssom] serializing <color>
- Re: [cssom] serializing <color>
- Re: [cssom] serializing <color>
- Re: [cssom] serializing <color>
- Re: Scientific notation in numbers
- Re: Scientific notation in numbers
- Re: Feedback on 'image-fit' and 'image-position'
- Re: [css21] ident production does not match <identifier>
- Re: [cssom] serializing <color>
- Re: CSS/SVG FX taskforce telcon
- Re: CSS/SVG FX taskforce telcon
Monday, 15 February 2010
- Width/Height for css3-content
- Re: [cssom] serializing <color>
- Re: [css21] ident production does not match <identifier>
- Re: [CSS21] Incorrect link
- Re: [css21] ident production does not match <identifier>
- Re: [CSSOM] issues with cssText and selectorText
- Re: [css21] ident production does not match <identifier>
- Re: [css21] ident production does not match <identifier>
- Re: [css21] ident production does not match <identifier>
- Re: [css21] ident production does not match <identifier>
- Re: [css21] ident production does not match <identifier>
- Re: [cssom] serializing <color>
- Re: [CSSOM] issues with cssText and selectorText
- [css21] ident production does not match <identifier>
- Re: [cssom] serializing <color>
- Re: [cssom] serializing <color>
- [cssom] serializing <color>
- CSS/SVG FX taskforce telcon
Sunday, 14 February 2010
Saturday, 13 February 2010
Friday, 12 February 2010
- Re: collapsible property
- RE: Scientific notation in numbers
- RE: [cssom] Defining getComputedStyle
- Re: [cssom] Defining getComputedStyle
- Re: collapsible property
- RE: [cssom] Defining getComputedStyle
- Re: [cssom] Defining getComputedStyle
- Re: [css21] height/width computed value is wrong
- Re: collapsible property
- Re: collapsible property
- Re: collapsible property
- Re: collapsible property
- Re: collapsible property
- Re: collapsible property
Thursday, 11 February 2010
- Re: [cssom] Defining getComputedStyle
- Re: CSS Transitions and height:auto
- RE: Scientific notation in numbers
- Re: [css21] height/width computed value is wrong
- RE: Scientific notation in numbers
- Re: [cssom] Defining getComputedStyle
- Re: [css21] computed value of letter-spacing vs word-spacing
- Re: [cssom] Defining getComputedStyle
- Re: [css21] computed value of letter-spacing vs word-spacing
- Re: [cssom] Defining getComputedStyle
- Re: [css21] computed value of letter-spacing vs word-spacing
- Re: [css21] computed value of letter-spacing vs word-spacing
- Re: [cssom] Defining getComputedStyle
- Re: [cssom] Defining getComputedStyle
- RE: Scientific notation in numbers
- Re: [cssom] Defining getComputedStyle
- [css21] height/width computed value is wrong
- Re: CSS Transitions and height:auto
- Re: Scientific notation in numbers
- CSS Transitions and height:auto
- [css21] computed value of letter-spacing vs word-spacing
- [CSS21] Incorrect link
- Re: collapsible property
- Re: Please let me know about these warnings
- Re: collapsible property
- Re: [CSSOM] getClientRects should work on collapsed ranges in elements
- Re: collapsible property
- Re: collapsible property
- Re: collapsible property
- Re: collapsible property
- Re: collapsible property
- RE: Scientific notation in numbers
- Re: collapsible property
- Re: collapsible property
- [CSSOM] getClientRects should work on collapsed ranges in elements
- collapsible property
- Re: Scientific notation in numbers
Wednesday, 10 February 2010
- Re: Scientific notation in numbers
- Re: Scientific notation in numbers
- Re: Scientific notation in numbers
- [CSS2.1] Numbers don't allow signs in formal grammar, do in prose
- Re: Scientific notation in numbers
- Re: Scientific notation in numbers
- Re: Scientific notation in numbers
- Re: Scientific notation in numbers
- Re: Scientific notation in numbers
- Re: Scientific notation in numbers
- Re: [css-style-attr] SVG WG comments on CSS Styling Attributes Level 1
- Re: Scientific notation in numbers
- Re: Scientific notation in numbers
- Re: Scientific notation in numbers
- Scientific notation in numbers
- [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2010-02-10
- [css21] "Applies to:"
- Re: [css-style-attr] SVG WG comments on CSS Styling Attributes Level 1
Tuesday, 9 February 2010
- [css-style-attr] SVG WG comments on CSS Styling Attributes Level 1
- Re: [CSS3] @font vs @background
- Re: text-align:justify, inline-blocks, and MS test inline-formatting-context-019.xht
- Re: text-align:justify, inline-blocks, and MS test inline-formatting-context-019.xht
- text-align:justify, inline-blocks, and MS test inline-formatting-context-019.xht
- Re: [CSS 3] Transform on Complete Event
- Re: [CSS 3] Transform on Complete Event
Monday, 8 February 2010
- RE: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2010-01-27
- Re: [CSS 3] Transform on Complete Event
- RE: [CSS3] @font vs @background
Sunday, 7 February 2010
- [CSS 3] Transform on Complete Event
- Re: [CSS3] @font vs @background
- Re: [CSS3] @font vs @background
- RE: [CSS3] @font vs @background
Saturday, 6 February 2010
- Re: [CSS3] @font vs @background
- RE: [CSS3] @font vs @background
- Re: [CSS3] @font vs @background
- RE: [CSS3] @font vs @background
Friday, 5 February 2010
- Re: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2010-01-27
- Re: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2010-01-27
- [CSS3] @font vs @background
Thursday, 4 February 2010
- [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2010-01-27
- [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2010-02-03
- Re: [CSSOM] issues with cssText and selectorText
- Re: Ruby proposal for XSL 2.0 (batch2)
- Re: [CSS21] 8.3.1 margin-bottom of 'collapsed through' box with clearance applied
Wednesday, 3 February 2010
- Re: [CSS21] 8.3.1 margin-bottom of 'collapsed through' box with clearance applied
- [CSS21] 8.3.1 margin-bottom of 'collapsed through' box with clearance applied
- RE: [cssom] Defining getComputedStyle
- Re: [cssom] Defining getComputedStyle
- Re: [cssom] Defining getComputedStyle
- Re: [cssom] Defining getComputedStyle
- RE: [cssom] Defining getComputedStyle
- Re: [CSSOM] issues with cssText and selectorText
- Re: [CSSOM] issues with cssText and selectorText
- [CSSOM] issues with cssText and selectorText
- Re: [cssom] Defining getComputedStyle
- [cssom] Defining getComputedStyle