- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:18:43 +0100
- To: "Boris Zbarsky" <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
- Cc: "CSS WG" <www-style@w3.org>
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:12:57 +0100, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote: > On 2/11/10 12:00 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> As far as I can tell they mean different things for word-spacing too. >> There is nothing in the definition that suggests they would be the same. > > Sure there is. For word-spacing: > > normal > The normal inter-word space, as defined by the current font and/or > the UA. > <length> > This value indicates inter-word space in addition to the default > space between words. > > So if <length> is used and is 0, that means the normal inter-word space. > >> Also, FYI, Gecko treats these properties as I suggested ;-) (WebKit does >> the normal = 0 thing.) > > May I suggest updating to Firefox 3.6 before proceeding with more Gecko > testing? ;) [1] > > [1] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=470705 Ah cool! So all browsers agree and I should read CSS 2.1 more carefully next time around. (Ubuntu unfortunately does not update to the latest Firefox releases and although I have 3.7xxx or some such installed I sometimes forget to use it. Starting it up now :-)) -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Thursday, 11 February 2010 17:19:22 UTC