- From: John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:55:22 -0800 (PST)
- To: www-style <www-style@w3.org>
Jonathan Kew wrote: > I just noticed what I think is an omission in section 6.3 Fixed and pushed. Thomas Phinney wrote: > Also, in the same section, are each of these mutually exclusive? Where individual values are not mutually exclusive because of the syntax (e.g. font-variant-caps), mutually exclusive values are explicitly listed. In the case of 'font-variant-alternates', 'contextual' and 'no-contextual' are mutually exlcusive. Authors can in some cases can produce slightly nonsensical style rules but these are resolved in a consistent fashion, latter values take precedence: font-variant-numeric: proportional-nums oldstyle-nums tabular-nums; This is valid syntax. Because 'proportional-nums' and 'tabular-nums' are mutually exclusive, this is equivalent to: font-variant-numeric: oldstyle-nums tabular-nums; The section titled "Rendering considerations" lists rules for resolving combinations of settings. John
Received on Friday, 26 February 2010 01:55:56 UTC