- From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 18:05:08 -0000
- To: "'Tony Graham'" <Tony.Graham@MenteithConsulting.com>
- Cc: <w3c-xsl-fo-sg@w3.org>, <member-japanese-layout-en@w3.org>, <member-i18n-core@w3.org>, <www-style@w3.org>
Hi Tony, I have begun reading the wiki, but took time to refresh myself on the concepts by reading the related documents first. Here are some initial personal comments. [1] Types of ruby, 1st table Group ruby X single kanji: I'd argue NO, since that would be mono-ruby Group ruby X compound word: YES (the distinction between this and jukugo-ruby being that (a) you can't break a line in the compound noun, and (b) the ruby text is not distributed on a character by character basis) Jukugo-ruby X single kanji: NO (a single character isn't jukugo) Jukugo-ruby X Breakable: YES (this is one of the distinguishing features of jukugo vs group ruby) [2] Source documents, CSS3 ruby module There is a later version of this document, with at least one critical difference. http://www.w3.org/Style/Group/css3-src/css3-ruby/#ruby-line-breaking authored by Paul Nelson, contains a section that describes line-breaking behaviour. I linked to that page from a CSS WG page, but the status of that document is not clear. RI PS: Since www-style is a public list, could we switch the cc from member-i18n-core to public-i18n-core ? ============ Richard Ishida Internationalization Lead W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) http://www.w3.org/International/ http://rishida.net/ > -----Original Message----- > From: member-japanese-layout-en-request@w3.org [mailto:member- > japanese-layout-en-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Tony Graham > Sent: 19 January 2010 09:48 > To: member-japanese-layout-en@w3.org; member-i18n-core@w3.org; www- > style@w3.org > Cc: w3c-xsl-fo-sg@w3.org > Subject: Ruby proposal for XSL 2.0 > > FYI, the XSL FO SG is developing a proposal for handling ruby in XSL 2.0 > at http://www.w3.org/Style/XSL/Group/FO/wiki/Ruby > > Any comments would be very welcome, and feedback on the identified > issues would be appreciated. > > The proposal is based on the ruby details in JLReq [1] while trying to > remain compatible with the CSS3 Ruby Module [2] (which is on hold [3]). > > Please note that while JLReq defines three types of ruby, the XHTML Ruby > Annotation module and the CSS3 Ruby Module do not distinguish between > mono-ruby and jukugo-ruby. The CSS3 Ruby Module refers to JIS X > 4051:1995, not to JIS X 4051:2004, where Jukugo-ruby is in JIS X > 2051:2004 but not in JIS X 4051:1995. > > Regards, > > > Tony Graham Tony.Graham@MenteithConsulting.com > Director W3C XSL FO SG Invited Expert > Menteith Consulting Ltd XML Guild member > XML, XSL and XSLT consulting, programming and training > Registered Office: 13 Kelly's Bay Beach, Skerries, Co. Dublin, Ireland > Registered in Ireland - No. 428599 http://www.menteithconsulting.com > -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- > xmlroff XSL Formatter http://xmlroff.org > xslide Emacs mode http://www.menteith.com/wiki/xslide > Unicode: A Primer urn:isbn:0-7645-4625-2 > > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/NOTE-jlreq-20090604/ > [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/CR-css3-ruby-20030514 > [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Jun/0341.html
Received on Tuesday, 2 February 2010 18:05:40 UTC