Re: vendor prefix properties diverging from official properties

On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 10:15 PM, Sylvain Galineau
<sylvaing@microsoft.com> wrote:
> This topic has come up before; see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009May/0105.html.
>
> Notably, a -w3c prefixed was proposed.

There didn't seem to be any real resolution there.  Everyone agreed
that Mozilla supporting -webkit- properties was a bad idea, but I
didn't see any real objections to some standard prefix for drafts,
like -w3c- or -*- or -wd- or draft- or whatever.  Does anyone have any
problems with that, for browsers that fully implement a property from
a CSS draft?  Vendor prefixes could still be reserved for non-standard
properties, and implementations that are so incomplete or buggy that
the vendor doesn't want to inflict them on the general public yet.

Received on Friday, 26 February 2010 20:29:18 UTC