- From: Zack Weinberg <zweinberg@mozilla.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 15:09:49 -0800
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Zack Weinberg <zweinberg@mozilla.com> wrote: > One implementor's comments on the scientific notation issue (please > keep in mind that dbaron may disagree with me): Additional observation: in both SVG 1.1 and SVG Tiny 1.2, scientific-notation numbers are defined as matching this regular expression [+-]?(([0-9]*\.)?[0-9]+)[Ee][0-9]+ (they don't use those words but that's what it comes out to). Note how a sign is not allowed after the E. Mozilla's implementation does allow a sign. This is IMO an error in SVG -- scientific notation is not much use if it's only good for really *big* numbers (in particular, for transforms, what one is likely to want is *small* numbers). zw
Received on Wednesday, 10 February 2010 23:10:26 UTC