Zack Weinberg <zweinberg@mozilla.com> wrote: > One implementor's comments on the scientific notation issue (please > keep in mind that dbaron may disagree with me): Additional observation: in both SVG 1.1 and SVG Tiny 1.2, scientific-notation numbers are defined as matching this regular expression [+-]?(([0-9]*\.)?[0-9]+)[Ee][0-9]+ (they don't use those words but that's what it comes out to). Note how a sign is not allowed after the E. Mozilla's implementation does allow a sign. This is IMO an error in SVG -- scientific notation is not much use if it's only good for really *big* numbers (in particular, for transforms, what one is likely to want is *small* numbers). zwReceived on Wednesday, 10 February 2010 23:10:26 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:07:42 UTC