- From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 03:56:54 +0800
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 23 February 2010 19:57:40 UTC
On Feb 24, 2010, at 3:29 AM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > >>> szilles: Is there an example elsewhere of a slash without something >>> before it? >> > > The border-image syntax is different in two ways from the background > shorthand. > > 1. The order of the elements separated by the slash is fixed. OK, and the order of bg-position, the slash, and bg-size should also be fixed, the way I was imagining it working. > 2. You cannot drop elements leading into the slash or trailing from > it: it is > always separating two parts of a fixed sequence. True, but I don't see why that's a problem. It is still an example of a slash without something [other than another slash and content on the other side of THAT slash] before it. As I see it working for background, it would be separating two parts of a fixed-order sequence, in which you could still drop other parts in, as long as size could only be included if it was somewhere to the right of a slash.
Received on Tuesday, 23 February 2010 19:57:40 UTC