- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 17:45:29 +0100
- To: "Boris Zbarsky" <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
- Cc: "CSS WG" <www-style@w3.org>
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 17:38:19 +0100, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote: >> (The keywords are returned in lowercase, not in the case >> specified by the specification. I personally like this.) > > Since CSS is case-insensitive, there is no "case specified by the > specification", actually. Sure there is. The specification says WindowText, not windowtext. ASCII lowercase works for me though. >> Personally I quite prefer the way Opera handles this, though preserving >> system colors might be valuable. Not sure. > > It's a requirement to not have dataloss in any sort of CSS editor, no? > Heck, so is preserving the named colors that always map to the same > color, from a human-readability point of view... A CSS editor cannot use the CSSOM. There are so many other things that are lost that a CSS editor needs that I do not think it is worth it to consider that as an argument for retaining this information (at least not when serializing). I thought we already came to that conclusion. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Monday, 15 February 2010 16:46:02 UTC