- From: Zack Weinberg <zweinberg@mozilla.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 15:17:07 -0800
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU> wrote: > > Thus an implementation of SVG 1.1 would be expected to parse > scientific notation only in the XML attribute values. Then <length> > is defined in terms of <number> and explicitly points to the above > distinction. ... > > I don't know what changes have been made in the SVG 2 drafts. http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-SVGTiny12-20081222/types.html#DataTypeNumber seems to have dropped the distinction (and the compatibility-with-CSS2 rationale) that you quote. zw
Received on Wednesday, 10 February 2010 23:17:50 UTC