On 01/27/2010 02:02 PM, Sylvain Galineau wrote: >> From: www-style-request@w3.org [mailto:www-style-request@w3.org] On >> Behalf Of Daniel Glazman >> Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 11:59 PM >> To: www-style@w3.org >> Subject: Re: [css3-background] border-radius color transitions using >> gradients recommended but undefined > > >> Let's continue the discussion at the technical level, to see if we can >> find a preferred and desired behaviour that is interoperably >> implementable. Speeding up things to avoid another stage back at >> WD level does not seem to me a reasonable argument here. >> If the investigation shows that no interoperable algo can be found >> at this time, then the "undefined _for the time being_ because of >> platform constraints" solution will probably be the best. But since >> this investigation did not really happen, we're unable to resolve now. >> The CR period ends in June and that should be enough to untie the knot. > > To be clear, I have no issues with this feature being undefined. I do have a > problem with it being both recommended and undefined... Wrt your comment and <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Feb/0019.html> I propose the following: Append to the paragraph: # It is not defined what these transitions look like, but a gradient # is recommended for color transitions that don't involve dotted or # dashed borders. the following text: | The start and end color stops should be given by the line segments | connecting the tips of the inner radii with the corresponding tips | of the outer radii, and the halfway point between the start and end | colors should align with the transition center defined above. Conical | gradients are suggested for gradient color transitions. Please let me know if this sufficiently addresses your concern. ~fantasaiReceived on Tuesday, 23 February 2010 01:13:50 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:07:43 UTC