W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2010

Re: [cssom] Defining getComputedStyle

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 20:51:20 +0100
To: rfink@readableweb.com, "'CSS WG'" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.u7khfuc464w2qv@annevk-t60>
On Wed, 03 Feb 2010 19:46:45 +0100, Richard Fink <rfink@readableweb.com>  
>> Does this sound like a good direction?
> FWIW: Yes indeed. Very much. I don't remember, but I might have used the  
> term "appliedStyle" as a synonym for what I think you are proposing with  
> the term "resolved values".
> [...] I think "resolved values" would be highly useful.

To be clear, I am not proposing any changes to getComputedStyle. I simply  
want to define it because a) the current definition no longer works due to  
CSS 2.1 changing definitions and b) browsers do different things. E.g. for  
'width' it's very easy to get three different results testing three  

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Wednesday, 3 February 2010 19:51:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:13:43 UTC