- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 19:10:41 -0800
- To: "Adam Twardoch (List)" <list.adam@twardoch.com>
- CC: www-style <www-style@w3.org>
On 02/25/2010 06:08 PM, Adam Twardoch (List) wrote: > I would like to request that font-variant-caps be extended as follows: > > <caps-value> = small-caps | all-small-caps* | petite-caps | > all-petite-caps* | titling-caps | unicase > > small-caps = OpenType smcp > all-small-caps = OpenType c2sc+smcp (both applied at the same time) > petite-caps = OpenType pcap > all-petite-caps = OpenType c2pc+pcap (both applied at the same time) > titling-caps = OpenType titl > unicase = OpenType unic > > * Denotes the addition. > > The rationale behind is that in typical use, you: > - either use normal uppercase letters mixed with small caps in place of > lowercase letters (that would be the small-caps case, i.e. OpenType smcp) > - or use small caps in place of both uppercase and lowercase letters > (that would be the all-small-caps case, i.e. OpenType c2sc+smcp) > > A similar rationale applies to petite caps. > > The scenario of users wanting to use small caps in place of uppercase > letters mixed with normal lowercase letters is very unlikely, but if the > author wants it, she or he can use font-feature-settings: "c2sc=1". > > Similarly, a rather uncommon scenario where the user wants to use small > caps in place of uppercase letters mixed with petite caps in place of > lowercase letters is unlikely, but if the authors wants it, she or he > can use font-feature-settings: "c2sc=1,pcap=1". Wouldn't text-transform: lower-case; font-variant: small-caps or text-transform: lower-case; font-variant: petite-caps work? ~fantasai
Received on Friday, 26 February 2010 03:11:19 UTC