As long as I'm close-reading the number syntax: Section 4.3.1 says that 'Both integers and real numbers may be preceded by a "-" or "+" to indicate a sign', but neither the section 4 forward-compatible formal syntax nor the appendix G formal syntax permits a sign. Section 4 has num [0-9]+|[0-9]*\.[0-9]+ and appendix G has num [0-9]+|[0-9]*"."[0-9]+ Since the prose trumps the formal syntax, I think this is just an editorial issue: both {num} macro definitions should read num [+-]?[0-9]+|[0-9]*\.[0-9]+ (We may as well make them consistent with each other at the same time.) zwReceived on Wednesday, 10 February 2010 23:15:53 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:07:42 UTC