- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 15:09:47 -0800
- To: Jeff Walden <jwalden@MIT.EDU>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
On 02/24/2010 01:32 PM, Jeff Walden wrote:
> background-repeat is a comma-separated list of <repeat-style>. The
> grammar for that is:
>
> <repeat-style> = repeat-x | repeat-y | [repeat | space | round |
> no-repeat]{1,2}
>
> The list of meanings for the single-value cases is in this order:
> ...
> The list of meanings for the double-value cases is in this order:
> ...
>
> These two lists are ordered consistently with each other but not with
> the <repeat-style> grammar. It would seem slightly better to use this
> grammar (only change is a semantically-equivalent reordering) instead,
> so that the order of terms in <repeat-style> is the same as the orders
> in the explanations:
>
> <repeat-style> = repeat-x | repeat-y | [repeat | no-repeat | space |
> round]{1,2}
Fixed. (I reordered the descriptions.)
http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-background/#background-repeat
Let me know if this is good.
~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 24 February 2010 23:10:25 UTC