- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 18:16:09 +0100
- To: "Jonathan Kew" <jonathan@jfkew.plus.com>
- Cc: "CSS WG" <www-style@w3.org>
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 18:08:35 +0100, Jonathan Kew <jonathan@jfkew.plus.com> wrote: > On 15 Feb 2010, at 16:24, Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/syndata.html#value-def-identifier mentions >> U+00A1 which has number 161 and seems about right. Yet the grammar >> defines nonascii as anything beyond 177 which is U+00B1 which does not >> really make sense to me. Thinking about it some more explicitly >> excluding 127-160 does not really seem needed either to me and maybe >> they should become part of nonascii (would also make the name somewhat >> more logical). >> >> Am I missing something? > > I take it you're referring to the line > > nonascii [^\0-\177] > > The \177 there is an OCTAL escape, so that means 127 decimal / 0x7f hex, > which is correct for the ASCII range. Ah, thanks, so it's the U+00A1 reference that's weird. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Monday, 15 February 2010 17:16:41 UTC