- From: Andrew Fedoniouk <news@terrainformatica.com>
- Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 21:15:52 -0800
- To: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- CC: www-style <www-style@w3.org>
Sylvain Galineau wrote: >> From: Andrew Fedoniouk [mailto:news@terrainformatica.com] >> Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 7:20 PM >> To: Sylvain Galineau >> Cc: www-style >> Subject: Re: [CSS3] @font vs @background > > >> Could you imagine that, say, JavaScript has different precedence rules >> for ',' operator inside different functions and name of the function >> will trigger different meaning for ',' operator? > > Well, I don't *need* to imagine it, CSS has been this way for quite some > time. You imply that this is a problem for people writing CSS parsers > in JS. That is a small number, afaik. Can you point to evidence that this > is or has been a problem for them ? > CSS has *not* been this way before. There is no ' '/',' mess in CSS21 AFAIR. When you see a bug what kind of evidence/metrics you need? Number of WTFs per minute coming from parser designers, JS and CSS authors or what? It *is* a bug. As any bug it could be fixed or left as it is - declared as such a feature. It is up to us - to the personal flexibility of "engineering conscience". Sorry for the pathetic tone but I really do not understand what you are trying to say. -- Andrew Fedoniouk. http://terrainformatica.com
Received on Saturday, 6 February 2010 05:16:12 UTC