- From: Adam Twardoch (List) <list.adam@twardoch.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 01:01:46 +0100
- To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
The issue with some OpenType features such as "stylistic sets", in CSS proposal terms "font-variant-alternates: styleset(n)" is that in one font, the styleset 1 may provide, say, lowercase letters with longer descender and styleset 2 may provide upright parantheses in an italic font, but in another font, styleset 1 may provide ornamented caps, and styleset 8 may provide upright parantheses in an italic font. To get the behavior of upright parantheses in an italic font in the main font and in the fallback font, one would need to specify that the main font uses styleset 1 and the fallback font uses styleset 8. Or perhaps the fallback font does not have any upright parantheses but it does indeed provide ornamented caps in styleset 1. Then the author would want to use styleset 1 from the main font for the upright-parantheses effect, but not use any styleset in the fallback font, because using the styleset 1 from the fakkback font would make the ornamented caps appear -- something that the author does not want at all. Best, Adam -- Adam Twardoch | Language Typography Unicode Fonts OpenType | twardoch.com | silesian.com | fontlab.net Reporter: "So what will your trip to Ireland look like?" Lech Wałęsa: "I get into a car, then onto a plane, and then the other way around."
Received on Friday, 26 February 2010 00:02:22 UTC