- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 17:42:16 -0600
- To: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 5:15 PM, Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com> wrote: > Should I want to go experimental and risk some interop kinks, Tab's > gradient image feature offers a very interesting risk/reward ratio. And > if few people do care about the actual color interpolation used in gradients, > it's even more interesting. (Although I suspect getting gradients right on a > large surface matters more than on a border corner) Indeed, large-area gradients are much more important to get exact. I expect that the *-gradient() functions will often be used to line up with other layout elements, frex, where pixel perfection is very nice to have. A gradient on a border corner, though, really *can't* be used like that in any expected normal usage. It should only become important when you go out of you way to turn the transition area into a large-area gradient, such as by making an element that is nothing *but* curved border ("foo { border-style: solid; border-width: 100px 50px; border-color: red green blue yellow; border-radius: 100%/100%; }"). (Interestingly, it appears that such an thick-border element is impossible to use anyway today - both Firefox and Chrome render it *extremely* badly. They both fail the "objectively ugly" test.) ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 24 February 2010 23:43:04 UTC