www-rdf-logic@w3.org from May 2001 by author

Alexandre Delteil

• Contexts, Axioms and Definitions in RDF(S) (Friday, 4 May)

Andrew Hill

• RE: relational mapping? (Thursday, 3 May)

Balon, Corey

• RE: Not-subClassOf (Wednesday, 23 May)
• RE: Not-subClassOf (Wednesday, 23 May)

Bill Andersen

• Re: What do the ontologists want (Thursday, 31 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Thursday, 31 May)
• Re: RDF Abstract Syntax: a strawman (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: Is the meaning of order intrinsic ? (Saturday, 26 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Thursday, 17 May)

Brian McBride

• Jena bug fixed (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: DAML ObjectProp vs DatatypeProp (Wednesday, 16 May)
• concrete types and inference (Monday, 7 May)

Charles F. Munat

• RE: What do the ontologists want (Wednesday, 16 May)
• RE: What do the ontologists want (Wednesday, 16 May)
• RE: What do the ontologists want (Wednesday, 16 May)
• RE: What do the ontologists want (Tuesday, 15 May)

Dan Brickley

• RE: What do the ontologists want (Saturday, 19 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Thursday, 17 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Wednesday, 16 May)

Dan Connolly

• Re: use/mention and reification: rdf:predicate/subject/object[was: RDF Abstract Syntax...] (Monday, 28 May)
• use/mention and reification: rdf:predicate/subject/object [was: RDF Abstract Syntax...] (Saturday, 26 May)
• Re: RDF Abstract Syntax: a strawman (Saturday, 26 May)
• Re: N3 vs. XML (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: metadata vs. meta-(meta)-data (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: N3 vs. XML (rdf:parseType) (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: DAML+OIL bug (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: DAML+OIL bug (Saturday, 19 May)
• Re: The Mel99 semantics for RDF (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: The Mel99 semantics for RDF (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Thursday, 17 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Thursday, 17 May)
• The Mel99 semantics for RDF (Thursday, 17 May)
• Re: DAML ObjectProp vs DatatypeProp (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (what URIs denote) (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (what URIs denote) (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (what URIs denote) (Tuesday, 15 May)

Danny Ayers

• RE: Is the meaning of order intrinsic ? (Saturday, 26 May)
• RE: RDF Abstract Syntax: a strawman (Saturday, 26 May)
• RE: CG: Re: Is the meaning of order intrinsic ? (Friday, 25 May)
• RE: Why Triples? (was Re: What do the ontologists want) (Thursday, 24 May)
• RE: Desirata for Symbols (was Re: What do the ontologists want) (Sunday, 20 May)
• RE: Why Triples? (was Re: What do the ontologists want) (Sunday, 20 May)
• RE: Why Triples? (was Re: What do the ontologists want) (Sunday, 20 May)
• RE: Why Triples? (was Re: What do the ontologists want) (Sunday, 20 May)
• RE: Why Triples? (was Re: What do the ontologists want) (Saturday, 19 May)
• RE: Surface vs. Abstract Syntax, was: RE: What do the ontologists want (Saturday, 19 May)
• RE: What do the ontologists want (Friday, 18 May)
• W3C will again cast pearls (was :RE: What do the ontologists want) (Friday, 18 May)
• RE: What do the ontologists want (Friday, 18 May)
• useful reification (Thursday, 17 May)
• RE: What do the ontologists want? (Tuesday, 15 May)
• RE: DAML Correction: Same Is Not A Sub Of Sub (Saturday, 5 May)
• RE: relational mapping? (Thursday, 3 May)
• RE: relational mapping? (Thursday, 3 May)
• relational mapping? (Thursday, 3 May)

David Allsopp

• Re: RDF Abstract Syntax: a strawman (Friday, 25 May)
• Re: N3 vs. XML (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: N3 vs. XML (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: Why Triples? (was Re: What do the ontologists want) (Monday, 21 May)
• Re: Surface vs. Abstract Syntax, was: RE: What do the ontologists want (Monday, 21 May)
• Re: N3 vs. XML (Monday, 21 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Monday, 21 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Thursday, 17 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want? (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want? (Tuesday, 15 May)

dehora

• RE: What do the ontologists want (Sunday, 20 May)
• RE: What do the ontologists want (Saturday, 19 May)
• RE: What do the ontologists want (Friday, 18 May)
• RE: What do the ontologists want (Wednesday, 16 May)

Dickinson, Ian J

• RE: What do the ontologists want (Tuesday, 15 May)

Drew McDermott

• Re: RDF Abstract Syntax: a strawman (Tuesday, 29 May)
• Re: RDF Abstract Syntax: a strawman (Friday, 25 May)
• Re: N3 vs. XML (Thursday, 24 May)
• Re: N3 vs. XML (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: metadata vs. meta-(meta)-data (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: DAML+OIL bug (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: N3 vs. XML (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Problem with 'not' (was Re: What do the ontologists want) (Tuesday, 22 May)
• N3 vs. XML (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: DAML ObjectProp vs DatatypeProp (Thursday, 17 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Thursday, 17 May)
• Re: DAML ObjectProp vs DatatypeProp (Thursday, 17 May)
• Re: DAML ObjectProp vs DatatypeProp (Thursday, 17 May)
• DAML ObjectProp vs DatatypeProp (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Wednesday, 16 May)
• DAML+OIL bug (Tuesday, 15 May)

Emery, Pat

• RE: CG: Re: Is the meaning of order intrinsic ? (Friday, 25 May)
• RE: Is the meaning of order intrinsic ? (Thursday, 24 May)
• RE: Is the meaning of order intrinsic ? (Thursday, 24 May)
• RE: Not-subClassOf (Wednesday, 23 May)
• RE: N3 vs. XML (Tuesday, 22 May)
• RE: What do the ontologists want (Friday, 18 May)
• RE: What do the ontologists want (Thursday, 17 May)

Enrico Franconi

• Last CfP: Foundations of Models for Information Integration workshop (FMII-2001) (Monday, 14 May)
• Re: Cyclic Classes/Properties (Friday, 11 May)

Frank Manola

• Re: What do the ontologists want (Monday, 21 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Monday, 21 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want? (Monday, 14 May)

Graham Klyne

• Re: Predicates and Arcs vs Triples RE: use/mention and reification: rdf:predicate/subject/object (Thursday, 31 May)
• RE: use/mention and reification: rdf:predicate/subject/object [was: RDF Abstract Syntax...] (Sunday, 27 May)
• Re: Predicates and Arcs vs Triples RE: use/mention and reification: rdf:predicate/subject/object (Sunday, 27 May)
• RE: use/mention and reification: rdf:predicate/subject/object [was: RDF Abstract Syntax...] (Sunday, 27 May)
• Re: use/mention and reification: rdf:predicate/subject/object [was: RDF Abstract Syntax...] (Sunday, 27 May)
• Theoretical view of order (Sunday, 27 May)
• Currying (Friday, 25 May)
• Re: N3 vs. XML (rdf:parseType) (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: N3 vs. XML (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Monday, 21 May)
• Re: N3 vs. XML (Monday, 21 May)
• RE: Surface vs. Abstract Syntax, was: RE: What do the ontologists want (Monday, 21 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Monday, 21 May)
• RE: What do the ontologists want (Sunday, 20 May)
• RE: What do the ontologists want (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: The Mel99 semantics for RDF (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: The Mel99 semantics for RDF (Thursday, 17 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Thursday, 17 May)
• Progress (was: What do the ontologists want) (Thursday, 17 May)
• RE: What do the ontologists want? (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: RDF semantics: applications, formalism and education (Sunday, 6 May)
• Re: RDF semantics: applications, formalism and education (Sunday, 6 May)

Jan Grant

• Re: relational mapping? (Friday, 4 May)
• Re: relational mapping? (Thursday, 3 May)
• Re: relational mapping? (Thursday, 3 May)

Je'ro^me Euzenat

• Re: RDF Abstract Syntax: a strawman (Wednesday, 30 May)

Jim Hendler

• Re: What do the ontologists want (Monday, 21 May)
• RE: What do the ontologists want (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Thursday, 17 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want? (Thursday, 17 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want? (Tuesday, 15 May)

John D. Ramsdell

• Re: Set Theory (NBG) (Thursday, 17 May)
• Set Theory (NBG) (Thursday, 17 May)

John F. Sowa

• Re: CG: Re: Is the meaning of order intrinsic ? (Sunday, 27 May)
• Re: CG: Re: Is the meaning of order intrinsic ? (Friday, 25 May)

Jonathan Borden

• RE: Predicates and Arcs vs Triples RE: use/mention and reification: rdf:predicate/subject/object (Tuesday, 29 May)
• RE: use/mention and reification: rdf:predicate/subject/object [was: RDF Abstract Syntax...] (Sunday, 27 May)
• Predicates and Arcs vs Triples RE: use/mention and reification: rdf:predicate/subject/object (Sunday, 27 May)
• Proposal revisited: RE: use/mention and reification: rdf:predicate/subject/object... (Sunday, 27 May)
• RE: use/mention and reification: rdf:predicate/subject/object [was: RDF Abstract Syntax...] (Sunday, 27 May)
• RE: RDF Abstract Syntax: a strawman (Saturday, 26 May)
• RE: RDF Abstract Syntax: a strawman (Saturday, 26 May)
• RE: RDF Abstract Syntax: a strawman (Saturday, 26 May)
• RDF Abstract Syntax: a strawman (Thursday, 24 May)
• RE: URIs as names (was: What do the ontologists want) (Tuesday, 22 May)
• RE: Surface vs. Abstract Syntax, was: RE: What do the ontologists want (Saturday, 19 May)
• RE: Surface vs. Abstract Syntax, was: RE: What do the ontologists want (Saturday, 19 May)
• RE: What do the ontologists want (Friday, 18 May)
• RE: What do the ontologists want (Friday, 18 May)
• Surface vs. Abstract Syntax, was: RE: What do the ontologists want (Friday, 18 May)
• Sets, Nodes and Types was: Re: DAML ObjectProp vs DatatypeProp (Thursday, 17 May)
• Re: DAML ObjectProp vs DatatypeProp (Thursday, 17 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: DAML ObjectProp vs DatatypeProp (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Tuesday, 15 May)
• RE: What do the ontologists want? (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want? (Monday, 14 May)
• RE: What do the ontologists want? (Monday, 14 May)

jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com

• Re: RDF Abstract Syntax: a strawman (Monday, 28 May)
• Re: use/mention and reification: rdf:predicate/subject/object [was: RDF Abstract Syntax...] (Saturday, 26 May)
• Re: N3 vs. XML (Thursday, 24 May)
• RE: Not-subClassOf (Thursday, 24 May)
• Re: Not-subClassOf (Wednesday, 23 May)
• RE: Not-subClassOf (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: N3 vs. XML (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: Not-subClassOf (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: Not-subClassOf (Tuesday, 22 May)
• RE: N3 vs. XML (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: N3 vs. XML (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Sunday, 20 May)
• RE: Why Triples? (was Re: What do the ontologists want) (Sunday, 20 May)
• RE: Why Triples? (was Re: What do the ontologists want) (Sunday, 20 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Saturday, 19 May)
• Re: N3 vs. XML (Saturday, 19 May)
• RE: What do the ontologists want (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: Alternative RDF Syntaxes (n3, ...) (Friday, 18 May)
• RE: What do the ontologists want (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want? (Wednesday, 16 May)
• What do the ontologists want? (Saturday, 12 May)

Larry Masinter

• RE: metadata vs. meta-(meta)-data (Thursday, 24 May)
• metadata vs. meta-(meta)-data (Monday, 21 May)
• URIs as names (was: What do the ontologists want) (Sunday, 20 May)

Leo Obrst

• Re: What do the ontologists want (Tuesday, 15 May)

Marcelo Tallis

• RE: What do the ontologists want (Tuesday, 15 May)

Miles Sabin

• RE: What do the ontologists want (Sunday, 20 May)
• RE: What do the ontologists want (Sunday, 20 May)
• RE: What do the ontologists want (Tuesday, 15 May)
• RE: What do the ontologists want (Tuesday, 15 May)

Nick Bassiliades

• Re: relational mapping? (Friday, 4 May)

pat hayes

• Re: Predicates and Arcs vs Triples RE: use/mention and reification: rdf:predicate/subject/object (Thursday, 31 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Thursday, 31 May)
• Re: RDF Abstract Syntax: a strawman (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: Predicates and Arcs vs Triples RE: use/mention and reification: rdf:predicate/subject/object (Tuesday, 29 May)
• Re: use/mention and reification: rdf:predicate/subject/object [was: RDF Abstract Syntax...] (Tuesday, 29 May)
• Re: RDF Abstract Syntax: a strawman (Tuesday, 29 May)
• Re: Currying (Friday, 25 May)
• Re: Is the meaning of order intrinsic ? (Thursday, 24 May)
• RE: Surface vs. Abstract Syntax, was: RE: What do the ontologists want (Thursday, 24 May)
• Re: The Unique Names Assumption + RDF Layer 1 as Restricted FOL (Thursday, 24 May)
• RE: Why Triples? (was Re: What do the ontologists want) (Sunday, 20 May)
• RE: Why Triples? (was Re: What do the ontologists want) (Sunday, 20 May)
• Re: Desirata for Symbols (was Re: What do the ontologists want) (Sunday, 20 May)
• RE: Why Triples? (was Re: What do the ontologists want) (Sunday, 20 May)
• RE: Why Triples? (was Re: What do the ontologists want) (Sunday, 20 May)
• correction (was: RE: What do the ontologists want) (Sunday, 20 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Sunday, 20 May)
• Re: Desirata for Symbols (was Re: What do the ontologists want) (Sunday, 20 May)
• Re: URIs as names (was: What do the ontologists want) (Sunday, 20 May)
• RE: What do the ontologists want (Sunday, 20 May)
• Re: Ontologies =?= Languages (Sunday, 20 May)
• RE: Why Triples? (was Re: What do the ontologists want) (Saturday, 19 May)
• RE: Why Triples? (was Re: What do the ontologists want) (Saturday, 19 May)
• RE: Why Triples? (was Re: What do the ontologists want) (Saturday, 19 May)
• RE: What do the ontologists want (Saturday, 19 May)
• RE: Surface vs. Abstract Syntax, was: RE: What do the ontologists want (Saturday, 19 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Saturday, 19 May)
• RE: Surface vs. Abstract Syntax, was: RE: What do the ontologists want (Saturday, 19 May)
• RE: What do the ontologists want (Saturday, 19 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Saturday, 19 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Saturday, 19 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: Surface vs. Abstract Syntax, was: RE: What do the ontologists want (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Friday, 18 May)
• Interoperability (Was: what do ontologists want?) (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: W3C will again cast pearls (was :RE: What do the ontologists want) (Friday, 18 May)
• RE: What do the ontologists want (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Friday, 18 May)
• RE: What do the ontologists want (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Friday, 18 May)
• RE: What do the ontologists want (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Thursday, 17 May)
• RE: What do the ontologists want (Thursday, 17 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Thursday, 17 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Thursday, 17 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Thursday, 17 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Thursday, 17 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Thursday, 17 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Thursday, 17 May)
• RE: What do the ontologists want (Thursday, 17 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Thursday, 17 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Thursday, 17 May)
• RE: What do the ontologists want (Wednesday, 16 May)
• RE: What do the ontologists want (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (what URIs denote) (Wednesday, 16 May)
• RE: What do the ontologists want (Tuesday, 15 May)
• RE: What do the ontologists want (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want? (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Tuesday, 15 May)
• RE: What do the ontologists want? (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want? (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (what URIs denote) (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want? (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want? (Monday, 14 May)
• Re: Cyclic Classes/Properties [was: Re: DAML Correction: Same Is Not A Sub Of Sub] (Thursday, 10 May)

Peter Crowther

• RE: Not-subClassOf (Thursday, 24 May)
• RE: N3 vs. XML (Tuesday, 22 May)
• RE: What do the ontologists want (Monday, 21 May)
• RE: What do the ontologists want (Friday, 18 May)
• RE: What do the ontologists want? (Tuesday, 15 May)
• RE: Cyclic Classes/Properties [was: Re: DAML Correction: Same Is Not A Sub Of Sub] (Friday, 11 May)
• RE: Cyclic Classes/Properties [was: Re: ...] (Sunday, 6 May)
• RE: Cyclic Classes/Properties [was: Re: DAML Correction: Same Is Not A Sub Of Sub] (Sunday, 6 May)

Peter F. Patel-Schneider

• Re: What do the ontologists want (Thursday, 31 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Monday, 21 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Monday, 21 May)
• Re: The Mel99 semantics for RDF (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Thursday, 17 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Thursday, 17 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Thursday, 17 May)
• RE: What do the ontologists want (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: DAML ObjectProp vs DatatypeProp (Wednesday, 16 May)
• RE: What do the ontologists want (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want? (Monday, 14 May)

Ron Daniel

• RE: What do the ontologists want? (Monday, 14 May)

Sandro Hawke

• Re: metadata vs. meta-(meta)-data (Thursday, 24 May)
• Re: The Unique Names Assumption + RDF Layer 1 as Restricted FOL (Monday, 21 May)
• Re: metadata vs. meta-(meta)-data (Monday, 21 May)
• The Unique Names Assumption + RDF Layer 1 as Restricted FOL (Monday, 21 May)
• Re: Desirata for Symbols (was Re: What do the ontologists want) (Sunday, 20 May)
• Re: Why Triples? (was Re: What do the ontologists want) (Sunday, 20 May)
• Re: Desirata for Symbols (was Re: What do the ontologists want) (Saturday, 19 May)
• Re: Why Triples? (was Re: What do the ontologists want) (Saturday, 19 May)
• Desirata for Symbols (was Re: What do the ontologists want) (Saturday, 19 May)
• Ontologies =?= Languages (Saturday, 19 May)
• Layering (was Re: What do the ontologists want) (Saturday, 19 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Saturday, 19 May)
• Re: N3 vs. XML (Saturday, 19 May)
• Re: N3 vs. XML (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Friday, 18 May)
• Why Triples? (was Re: What do the ontologists want) (Friday, 18 May)
• Alternative RDF Syntaxes (n3, ...) (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Thursday, 17 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Thursday, 17 May)

Sean B. Palmer

• Re: Not-subClassOf (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: Not-subClassOf (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: Not-subClassOf (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: Alternative RDF Syntaxes (n3, ...) (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: Alternative RDF Syntaxes (n3, ...) (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Thursday, 17 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Thursday, 17 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Thursday, 17 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Thursday, 17 May)
• Reified Statements Using Restrictions (Monday, 14 May)
• Re: Cyclic Classes/Properties [was: Re: DAML Correction: Same Is Not A Sub Of Sub] (Sunday, 6 May)
• Cyclic Classes/Properties [was: Re: DAML Correction: Same Is Not A Sub Of Sub] (Saturday, 5 May)
• Re: DAML Correction: Same Is Not A Sub Of Sub (Saturday, 5 May)
• DAML Correction: Same Is Not A Sub Of Sub (Saturday, 5 May)

Sergey Melnik

• Re: The Mel99 semantics for RDF (Thursday, 31 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Thursday, 31 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Thursday, 17 May)

Seth Russell

• Re: RDF Abstract Syntax: a strawman (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: Is the meaning of order intrinsic ? (Saturday, 26 May)
• Re: Is the meaning of order intrinsic ? (Friday, 25 May)
• Re: Is the meaning of order intrinsic ? (Thursday, 24 May)
• Is the meaning of order intrinsic ? (Thursday, 24 May)
• Is the meaning of order intrinsic ? (Thursday, 24 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want? (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: relational mapping? (Friday, 4 May)
• Re: relational mapping? (Thursday, 3 May)
• Re: relational mapping? (Thursday, 3 May)

Siegfried Handschuh

• Semantic Web Mining - Workshop at ECML/PKDD (Thursday, 10 May)
• Ontologies Workshop - Call for Papers (Thursday, 10 May)

Sigfrid Lundberg, Lub NetLab

• Re: Cyclic Classes/Properties (Friday, 11 May)
• RE: Cyclic Classes/Properties [was: Re: DAML Correction: Same Is Not A Sub Of Sub] (Friday, 11 May)
• Re: Cyclic Classes/Properties [was: Re: DAML Correction: Same Is Not A Sub Of Sub] (Friday, 11 May)

Stefan Decker

• Re: RDF Abstract Syntax: a strawman (Wednesday, 30 May)
• RE: Desirata for Symbols (was Re: What do the ontologists want) (Sunday, 20 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Thursday, 17 May)

Stephen Reed

• Re: What do the ontologists want (Friday, 18 May)

tim finin

• Re: What do the ontologists want (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want? (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Tuesday, 15 May)

Uche Ogbuji

• Re: What do the ontologists want? (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want? (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: What do the ontologists want? (Tuesday, 15 May)

Wilson, MD (Michael)

• RE: What do the ontologists want (Friday, 18 May)

Wolfram Conen

• RDF model revisited, or: How to make the most out of Reifications and Containers (Thursday, 31 May)
• Re: Range interpretation question. (Tuesday, 1 May)

Ziv Hellman

• RE: Theoretical view of order (Sunday, 27 May)
• RE: Is the meaning of order intrinsic ? (Saturday, 26 May)
• RE: metadata vs. meta-(meta)-data (Wednesday, 23 May)
• RE: What do the ontologists want (Tuesday, 22 May)
• RE: Why Triples? (was Re: What do the ontologists want) (Monday, 21 May)
• RE: Desirata for Symbols (was Re: What do the ontologists want) (Sunday, 20 May)
• RE: Why Triples? (was Re: What do the ontologists want) (Sunday, 20 May)
• RE: Why Triples? (was Re: What do the ontologists want) (Sunday, 20 May)
• RE: Why Triples? (was Re: What do the ontologists want) (Saturday, 19 May)
• RE: Why Triples? (was Re: What do the ontologists want) (Saturday, 19 May)
• RE: What do the ontologists want (Friday, 18 May)
• RE: What do the ontologists want (Friday, 18 May)
• RE: Set Theory (NBG) (Thursday, 17 May)
• RE: What do the ontologists want (Wednesday, 16 May)

Last message date: Thursday, 31 May 2001 12:15:12 UTC