- From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 11:56:26 +0100
- To: "dehora" <bill@dehora.fsnet.co.uk>, pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Cc: www-rdf-logic@w3.org
At 09:31 PM 5/17/01 -0500, pat hayes wrote: >>in RDF: >> >>3: a statement is not a predicate. >>4: a statement is not a resource. > >? I thought a resource could be anything (?) I am still trying to find out >what 'resource' means, but Dan Connolly tells me that: >the standard [definition of resource] is RFC2396: > >[[[ > Resource > A resource can be anything that has identity. > [...] >]]] > >which seems to cover just about anything in the universe, certainly >including RDF statements. But if a statement does not have an identity? Dan's/Mel99 model theory had: N: the set of resources S: the set of statements, a subset of (NxNxN) [...] >>6: a resource clearly doesn't need to be reified to have a statement >>made about it. > >Not obvious to me at present. What does it mean to reify a _resource_? #g ------------ Graham Klyne GK@NineByNine.org
Received on Friday, 18 May 2001 08:54:49 UTC