- From: Drew McDermott <drew.mcdermott@yale.edu>
- Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 10:51:43 -0400 (EDT)
- To: www-rdf-logic@w3.org
[jos deroo] "python cwm.py sensor.n3 -rdf" produces <!-- Processed by Id: cwm.py,v 1.43 2001/05/15 21:50:35 timbl Exp --> <!-- using base file:/n3/sensor.n3--># Begining output. <rdf:RDF xmlns:sensor="foo:sensor#" xmlns:control="foo:control#" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/log#" xmlns:math="foo:math#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"> <rdf:Description> <rdf:is rdf:parseType="Quote"> <rdf:Description rdf:about="foo:sensor#thermostat"> <math:greaterThan>30</math:greaterThan> </rdf:Description> </rdf:is> <implies rdf:parseType="Quote"> <rdf:Description rdf:about="foo:control#furnace"> <control:setTo>1</control:setTo> </rdf:Description> </implies> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF> Stop the presses! There's an rdf:parseType Quote?? How does it work? Is a triple inside a Quote implicitly reified, or asserted like other triples; or does the Quote block the usual assertion convention? What if I wanted to say (forall (x) {sensor:thermostat math:equal ?x} log:implies {control:furnace control:setTo ?x}) possibly without the explicit quantifier. Would Quote still be sufficient? -- Drew McDermott
Received on Tuesday, 22 May 2001 10:51:46 UTC