Re: relational mapping?

On Thu, 3 May 2001, Seth Russell wrote:

> From: "Jan Grant" <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
>
> > On Thu, 3 May 2001, Danny Ayers wrote:
> >
> > > Has anyone come across a mapping of the relational model to RDF? I'm
> sure
> > > there's a pretty direct one possible at a low level (tuple to tuple I
> > > suppose), but it'll save me some thought and a lot of time if someone's
> > > already looked into this. Alternatively, if there's an RDFS around that
> > > contains RDBMS terms (schema, table, column etc) I'd very much like to
> hear
> > > about it. I'm wanting to operate at this latter level, but it would be
> nice
> > > to be on firm foundations.
> >
> > I've done quite a bit of thinking about it; got some paper notes which
> > I'm in the (slow) process of typing up. You're right, there's a simple
> > mechanical mapping of rows in a table to RDF; what you lose by this is
> > the natural linking of properties.
> >
> > For a sufficiently normalised relational schema*, you can generally
> > produce a mapping
> > (primary key) -> resource
> > (other values) -> properties
> > (foreign key) -> link to resource representing primary key for
> > foreign table
> >
>
> No doubt you are aware of the list of these recorded at [1], to which list I
> have added the structure diagrammed at [2].
>
> [1] http://www-db.stanford.edu/~melnik/rdf/db.html
> [2] http://robustai.net/mentography/SemStructure.gif

Neat; but these seem to be "storing RDF in RDBMS" as opposed to
"producing RDF from a (legacy?) RDBMS"

-- 
jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/
Tel +44(0)117 9287163 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 RFC822 jan.grant@bris.ac.uk
"Sufficiently large"="infinite" for sufficiently large values of "sufficiently"

Received on Thursday, 3 May 2001 12:09:33 UTC