- From: Danny Ayers <danny@panlanka.net>
- Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 00:20:28 +0600
- To: "Seth Russell" <seth@robustai.net>
- Cc: "RDF Logic" <www-rdf-logic@w3.org>
>I'm sure your right. I've been struggling with arriving at a good ontology >to use to express this term "prior, axiomatic, innate, a first principal, >atomic". Any suggestions are certainly very welcome. If 'Thing' be the >name of the top class of our ontology, then a subclass of that might be >named 'Pattern' with 'Sequence' being an obvious name of a >subClass thereof. >Yet any Thing isA Concept, least it not exist in our ontology, and >a concept >seems to me to be just a Pattern and we are not allowed to loop. ... so go >figure .... The struggle may be a sign that the wrong question is being asked... (though it may just be difficult, or even like Kryton of 'Red Dwarf' trying to say a word his ontology chip wouldn't allow : "Smeeeeeeeeeee...")
Received on Saturday, 26 May 2001 14:41:02 UTC