W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-logic@w3.org > May 2001

Re: What do the ontologists want?

From: Frank Manola <fmanola@mitre.org>
Date: Sun, 13 May 2001 20:11:10 -0400
Message-ID: <3AFF229E.4208913B@mitre.org>
To: jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
CC: phayes@ai.uwf.edu, www-rdf-logic@w3.org, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
As another member of the RDFCore WG, I'd like to second the motion.  At
the same time, there's been a fair bit of comment on www-rdf-logic on
what RDF lacks that is useful input on this particular issue (as well as
both axiomatic and model-theoretic semantics that can provide a good
starting point). 


jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com wrote:
> Pat,
> Since http://www.daml.org/listarchive/joint-committee/ is public
> and since I'm reading them from time to time, I came across
> http://www.daml.org/listarchive/joint-committee/0387.html
> In there, I found (among other comments)
>    [[[
>    It might be salutary and useful if the RDFCore were to spend some
>    time listening to what the ontologists want, instead of telling them
>    what they can have.
>    ]]]
> Since I am a member of the RDFCore WG I'm more than glad to listen
> to the ontologists. So what do the ontologists want?
> --
> Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/

Frank Manola                   The MITRE Corporation
202 Burlington Road, MS A345   Bedford, MA 01730-1420
mailto:fmanola@mitre.org       voice: 781-271-8147   FAX: 781-271-8752
Received on Sunday, 13 May 2001 20:10:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:45:37 UTC