- From: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 21:08:24 -0500
- To: "Ziv Hellman" <ziv@unicorn.com>
- Cc: www-rdf-logic@w3.org, Bill Andersen <andersen@ontologyworks.com>
- Message-Id: <v04210111b728de370b17@[205.160.76.173]>
>At the recently conducted conference in Hong Kong, I was puzzled by >the fact that in all the official SW sessions RDF was being pushed >almost as the completed essence of the Semantic Web itself, whilst >the many difficulties in RDF's capacities -- which numerous of the >participants were surely aware of through these threads and other >forums -- were never really aired. > >In informal corridor discussions with some of the individuals >heavily involved in the ontology community, it was explained to me >that they regard RDF simply as a tool for expressing graph relations >-- i.e. the triples encode nodes and the arcs between them -- >without any of the other promised capabilities, whether they be >semantic, model-theoretic, reification, and so forth. No less and no >more. > >If this is indeed the only "real" use the ontologists are intending >for RDF, perhaps the question of whether RDF is an efficient >mechanism for that purpose as well might deserve some discussion. > > >Cheers, > >Ziv > > >PS My apologies if this is leading too far from the original thread Not at all: I think you have put your finger right on the button. There is a mismatch between the reality and the rhetoric of RDF. As a general-purpose graph-structure-encoding formalism, it is just fine. (It has a truly awful surface syntax, but everyone agrees that is a crock and needs replacing.) But it hasnt been sold as that: it has been sold as a universal knowledge/information representation language, with a clear semantics which is both utterly simple (relational triples) and simultaneously universal, post-Goedelian, trans-Tarskian and magically universal, due to the Power of Reification. That is why it is going to be the, I don't know, the magical essence of the Semantic Web, and why W3C seems to be so committed to it. And this is just plain bullshit, as anyone who knows almost anything about Krep will immediately tell you. (Most people who know anything about Krep have either refused to get involved with RDF or have given up and taken a shower.) What we need to do is to first disentangle the reality from the hype, and then use some professionalism in trying to actually do some of the Krep work that the hype claims has already been done, but do it properly. DAML has been trying to make a start in that direction, for example. But it isnt going to be easy, and there aren't any magical solutions. Krep is a lot harder than hypertext markup. Pat Hayes --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola, FL 32501 (850)202 4440 fax phayes@ai.uwf.edu http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes
Received on Wednesday, 16 May 2001 22:08:28 UTC