- From: John D. Ramsdell <ramsdell@linus.mitre.org>
- Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 09:24:10 -0400
- To: "Www-Rdf-Logic" <www-rdf-logic@w3.org>
- CC: ramsdell@linus.mitre.org
I am puzzled by RDF's treatment of containers. It seems to me that RDF provides a way to talk about collections of objects without requiring that collections have the semantics one normally attaches to them. The standard practice in mathematics is to use set theory for that purpose, so why not restrict the models of RDF statements to those consistent with set theory? One could do this by allowing reasoning systems to assume the axioms of set theory. Von-Neumann-Bernays-Godel (NBG) set theory is well suited for this purpose. You can read more about NBG and mechanized mathematics in W. M. Farmer, "STMM: A Set Theory for Mechanized Mathematics", Journal of Automated Reasoning, 2000, Vol 26, No. 3, pp. 269-289, http://imps.mcmaster.ca/doc/stmm.pdf. John
Received on Thursday, 17 May 2001 09:24:45 UTC