www-rdf-interest@w3.org from February 2001 by date

Thursday, 1 March 2001

• FW: Re: Use/misuse of RDF:Value by way of
• Int. Workshop on Content-Based Multimedia Indexing-CBMI'2001 by way of

Wednesday, 28 February 2001

• [www-rdf-interest] <none> Seth Russell
• IST Action Line 'Semantic Web Technologies' and OpenHouseEvent in Luxembourg Hans-Georg Stork
• [www-rdf-interest] <none> Ana Alice Baptista
• Re: SWAG: What should the SWAG dictionary include? Seth Russell
• RE: SWAG: What should the SWAG dictionary include? Joshua Allen
• Re: SWAG: What should the SWAG dictionary include? Sean B. Palmer

Tuesday, 27 February 2001

• Knowledge and Information Systems: 3(1) and 3(2), 2001 by way of
• Re: Notes On The F2F Aaron Swartz

Monday, 26 February 2001

• If you want a coherent experience of the semantic web, you need personal semantic memory. Seth Russell
• Re: Notes On The F2F Sean B. Palmer
• Re: Notes On The F2F Seth Russell
• RE: [syndication] ANN: RDFnet Newsgroups Mike Dierken
• RE: [syndication] ANN: RDFnet Newsgroups Mike Dierken
• RE: [syndication] ANN: RDFnet Newsgroups Mike Dierken
• Notes On The F2F Sean B. Palmer
• Re: Slim RDF Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN

Sunday, 25 February 2001

• Model enthusiasts may be interested in this. Seth Russell
• Announcement: W3C Launches Semantic Web Activity (fwd) Dan Brickley
• ANN: RDFnet Newsgroups Aaron Swartz

Saturday, 24 February 2001

• RDF IG: Face to face meeting 26/27 Feb 2001, Cambridge MA, USA Dan Brickley

Friday, 23 February 2001

• XSB 2.3 Michael Kifer
• Re: Mapping External Triples Structures Into Your Own Systems Graham Klyne
• Re: Use/misuse of RDF:Value Aaron Swartz
• Re: Mapping External Triples Structures Into Your Own Systems Sean B. Palmer
• RE: Mapping External Triples Structures Into Your Own Systems Leigh Dodds
• Mapping External Triples Structures Into Your Own Systems Sean B. Palmer
• Use/misuse of RDF:Value lagoze@cs.cornell.edu
• Changes to the W3C's RDF sandbox Art Barstow

Thursday, 22 February 2001

• RDF Syntax: An XML Schema Approach Dan Connolly
• ANNOUNCE: RDF Gateway v.0.1 technology release Geoff Chappell
• Re: Semantic Memories, and other SW developments Seth Russell
• Re: IHMC concept maps Seth Russell
• Article: SW = ( SM + SC ) Sean B. Palmer
• Re: RDFS versioning Aaron Swartz
• RE: RDFS versioning Bill dehOra
• Re: RDFS versioning Sean B. Palmer
• RE: RDFS versioning Bill dehOra
• Re: IHMC concept maps David Allsopp
• Re: Semantic Memories, and other SW developments Sean B. Palmer
• Re: RDFS versioning Aaron Swartz
• RE: [redland] Redland News 2000-02-21 Danny Ayers
• Specifying the Syntax to Model Transformation Brian McBride
• RE: RDFS versioning Danny Ayers
• RE: RDFS term confusion Danny Ayers
• Re: Semantic Memories, and other SW developments Seth Russell
• RDF:Seq: no way to say "that's all, folks!" Dan Connolly
• goofy usage of rdfs:domain in infoset.rdf? Dan Connolly
• Re: RDFS implicitly included? Aaron Swartz
• RE: RDFS implicitly included? Bill de hOra
• rdf:property defined by RDFS Aaron Swartz
• RDFS term confusion Aaron Swartz
• RDFS versioning Aaron Swartz
• RDFS typographical issues Aaron Swartz
• clarifying RDFS properties Aaron Swartz
• RDFS terms used in non-schemas Aaron Swartz
• RDFS implicitly included? Aaron Swartz
• Non-namespaced RDF Aaron Swartz

Wednesday, 21 February 2001

• Re: [redland] Redland News 2000-02-21 Seth Russell
• Re: Slim RDF Sergey Melnik
• Re: IHMC concept maps Frank V. Castellucci
• Re: IHMC concept maps Seth Russell
• Re: rdf:about, rdf:ID and anonymous resources Aaron Swartz
• Re: IHMC concept maps Frank V. Castellucci
• Re: IHMC concept maps Seth Russell
• IHMC concept maps Bill de hOra
• Re: Decentralized RDF Distribution Seth Russell
• RE: Decentralized RDF Distribution ssarkar@ayushnet.com
• CFP: ICTAI 2001 by way of
• Re: Slim RDF Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN
• syntax issue? Brian McBride
• "certain well-structured XML DTDs" Aaron Swartz
• Re: Slim RDF Sergey Melnik

Tuesday, 20 February 2001

• Re: Decentralized RDF Distribution Aaron Swartz
• RE: Decentralized RDF Distribution Danny Ayers
• Re: Decentralized RDF Distribution ssarkar@ayushnet.com
• RE: Slim RDF McBride, Brian
• RE: Decentralized RDF Distribution Danny Ayers
• Re: Decentralized RDF Distribution Seth Russell
• Re: Decentralized RDF Distribution David Allsopp
• Semantic Memories, and other SW developments Sean B. Palmer

Monday, 19 February 2001

• ANN: 4Suite and 4Suite Server 0.10.2 Uche Ogbuji
• Re: Decentralized RDF Distribution Aaron Swartz
• Re: Slim RDF Sergey Melnik
• Re: Decentralized RDF Distribution Sean B. Palmer
• RE: Decentralized RDF Distribution Joshua Allen
• RE: Decentralized RDF Distribution Danny Ayers
• Re: Decentralized RDF Distribution Seth Russell
• RE: Decentralized RDF Distribution Bill de hOra
• RE: Decentralized RDF Distribution Bill de hOra
• RE: Decentralized RDF Distribution Danny Ayers
• RE: Decentralized RDF Distribution Danny Ayers
• Re: Decentralized RDF Distribution Aaron Swartz
• Re: Decentralized RDF Distribution Aaron Swartz
• RE: Decentralized RDF Distribution Danny Ayers
• Re: Decentralized RDF Distribution Seth Russell
• RE: Decentralized RDF Distribution Bill de hOra
• Re: Decentralized RDF Distribution Libby Miller
• Re: Decentralized RDF Distribution Seth Russell
• Re: Decentralized RDF Distribution Frank Manola
• JAXP patch for RDFAPI... David Li
• RE: Slim RDF McBride, Brian
• RE: Decentralized RDF Distribution Bill de hOra
• Re: Decentralized RDF Distribution David Allsopp
• Re: Decentralized RDF Distribution Seth Russell
• Decentralized RDF Distribution Aaron Swartz

Friday, 16 February 2001

• RE: Where should you look for metadata? Danny Ayers
• cfp: Issues in the Design and Experimental Evaluation of Systems for Modal and Temporal Logics by way of
• The Design and Implementation of the Redland RDF Application Framework Dave Beckett
• AGENTS FOR E-BUSINESS ON THE INTERNET by way of
• Re: Where should you look for metadata? Sean B. Palmer
• Where should you look for metadata? David Megginson
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? Sean B. Palmer
• Re: What are allowable property URIs? Aaron Swartz
• RE: Literals and URIs (2) Bill de hOra

Thursday, 15 February 2001

• Re: What are allowable property URIs? Jonathan Borden
• Re: What are allowable property URIs? Aaron Swartz
• Re: What are allowable property URIs? Jonathan Borden
• Re: What are allowable property URIs? Jonathan Borden
• RE: What are allowable property URIs? Graham Klyne
• Re: data: URI and resource Aaron Swartz
• Re: What are allowable property URIs? Aaron Swartz
• RE: What are allowable property URIs? Jonathan Borden
• data: URI and resource Graham Klyne
• Literals and URIs (2) Graham Klyne
• RE: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? Graham Klyne
• Literals and URIs (1) Graham Klyne
• RE: What are allowable property URIs? McBride, Brian
• Re: What are allowable property URIs? Gabe Beged-Dov
• Re: What are allowable property URIs? Aaron Swartz
• Re: What are allowable property URIs? Gabe Beged-Dov
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? Aaron Swartz
• RE: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? Bill de hOra
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? Aaron Swartz
• RE: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? Bill de hOra

Wednesday, 14 February 2001

• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? Aaron Swartz
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? Seth Russell
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? Aaron Swartz
• RE: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? Bill de hOra
• Re: What are allowable property URIs? Aaron Swartz
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? David Megginson
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? Graham Klyne
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? Graham Klyne
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? Graham Klyne
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? Graham Klyne
• What are allowable property URIs? Graham Klyne
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? Graham Klyne
• Namespaces and fragments Graham Klyne
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? Aaron Swartz

Tuesday, 13 February 2001

• Re: Another RDF Syntax Idea Aaron Swartz
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? Aaron Swartz
• Re: Metathesaurus issues. was: Re: does RDF require understandin jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• Metathesaurus issues. was: Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? Jonathan Borden
• Re: Another RDF Syntax Idea Dave Beckett
• Re: Another RDF Syntax Idea Aaron Swartz
• FOIS-2001 CFP by way of
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? David Megginson
• Re: Another RDF Syntax Idea Dave Beckett
• Re: Semantic Web Mining George Michael Pearson
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? Martin Duerst
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? Aaron Swartz
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? Sean B. Palmer
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? David Megginson
• Re: Simple extname<->URI-ref hack Arnold deVos
• Another RDF Syntax Idea Aaron Swartz
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? Martin Duerst
• RE: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? Bill de hOra
• RE: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? Bill de hOra

Monday, 12 February 2001

• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? Seth Russell
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? Bernard Vatant
• RE: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? Bill de hOra
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? Ross Judson
• Simple extname<->URI-ref hack Arnold deVos
• RE: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? Bill de hOra
• Re: Slim RDF Ross Judson
• Slim RDF Sergey Melnik
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? David Megginson
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? Ross Judson
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? Mark Grossman
• RE: About using distances or probabilities McBride, Brian
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? Sean B. Palmer
• RE: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? Bill de hOra
• Re: RDF IG meeting at W3C Technical Plenary 2001-02-28 Seth Russell
• RE: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? Bill de hOra
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? David Megginson
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? Sean B. Palmer
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? Dan Connolly
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? Sean B. Palmer
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? David Megginson
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? Ralph R. Swick
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? Sean B. Palmer
• Queries Re: RDF IG meeting at W3C Technical Plenary 2001-02-28 (fwd) Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: RDF IG meeting at W3C Technical Plenary 2001-02-28 David Allsopp
• Re: Semantic Web Mining George Michael Pearson
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? Henry S. Thompson
• RE: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? Jonathan Borden
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? Sean B. Palmer
• RE: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? Jonathan Borden

Sunday, 11 February 2001

• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? Aaron Swartz

Saturday, 10 February 2001

• Re: RDF IG meeting at W3C Technical Plenary 2001-02-28 Seth Russell
• W3C Semantic Web Activity: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/ Dan Brickley

Friday, 9 February 2001

• Re: About using distances or probabilities Seth Russell
• Re: About using distances or probabilities Seth Russell
• R: Semantic Web Mining Antonio Tomarchio
• CFP: IJCAI-01 Workshop on Ontology Learning Alexander Maedche
• Semantic Web Mining Gerd Stumme
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? Gabe Beged-Dov
• Announcement: RDF Crawler available for Download Siegfried Handschuh
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? Dan Brickley
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? Dave Beckett
• Re: RDF IG meeting at W3C Technical Plenary 2001-02-28 David Allsopp
• Re: RDF IG meeting at W3C Technical Plenary 2001-02-28 David Allsopp

Thursday, 8 February 2001

• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? Jonathan Borden
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? David Megginson
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? Graham Klyne
• Re: RDF standard for PRIVACY STATUS of a document Graham Klyne
• re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? Roland Schwaenzl
• Re: About using distances or probabilities David Allsopp
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? Dave Beckett
• RE: About using distances or probabilities Bill de hOra
• re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? David Megginson
• Re: About using distances or probabilities David Allsopp

Wednesday, 7 February 2001

• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? Dan Connolly
• does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: About using distances or probabilities Seth Russell
• RE: Self introduction of Michel Biezunski and Steven R. Newcomb Michel Biezunski
• Re: RDF standard for PRIVACY STATUS of a document Dorn Alexander
• About using distances or probabilities harmeet singh lamba
• RE: Self introduction of Michel Biezunski and Steven R. Newcomb McBride, Brian
• Self introduction of Michel Biezunski and Steven R. Newcomb Michel Biezunski
• Re: RDF standard for PRIVACY STATUS of a document Mark Nottingham
• Re: RDF standard for PRIVACY STATUS of a document Charles McCathieNevile

Tuesday, 6 February 2001

• Re: Dropping the redundant colon in N3 Tim Berners-Lee
• RDF standard for PRIVACY STATUS of a document Dorn Alexander

Monday, 5 February 2001

• example: RDF for Web server config Dan Brickley
• RE: Freenet, distributed search and simple RDF queries Bill de hOra
• ANNOUNCEMENT: Redland RDF Application Framework 0.9.8 Dave Beckett
• Re: [freenet-tech] RE: Freenet, distributed search and simple RDF queries Johan Hjelm

Sunday, 4 February 2001

• Re: [freenet-tech] RE: Freenet, distributed search and simple RDF queries Dan Brickley
• RE: Containers Jonathan Borden
• RE: Containers McBride, Brian
• Re: Announcement: RDF Representation of Wordnet available for Download Dan Brickley
• Re: Announcement: RDF Representation of Wordnet available for Download Aaron Swartz
• RE: Containers Jonathan Borden

Saturday, 3 February 2001

• RE: Freenet, distributed search and simple RDF queries Dan Brickley
• RE: Freenet, distributed search and simple RDF queries Joshua Allen
• Re: Freenet, distributed search and simple RDF queries Dan Brickley
• Call for Participation: W3C Workshop on Web services Hugo Haas
• RE: RDF IG meeting at W3C Technical Plenary 2001-02-28 Dan Brickley
• Re: Freenet, distributed search and simple RDF queries William Loughborough
• RE: RDF IG meeting at W3C Technical Plenary 2001-02-28 Jonathan Borden
• Freenet, distributed search and simple RDF queries Dan Brickley

Friday, 2 February 2001

• Announcement: RDF Representation of Wordnet available for Download Stefan Decker
• ANNOUNCE: RDF::Service 0.0404 Jonas Liljegren
• RE: Containers Graham Klyne
• Re: Practical N3/SW Uses jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• RE: Containers McBride, Brian
• RE: Containers McBride, Brian
• Re: FW: Cursors face defining moments on the Web raghuram

Thursday, 1 February 2001

• Fwd: Containers Graham Klyne
• Re: Quotes in N3 Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: Dropping the redundant colon in N3 jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• RE: Dropping the redundant colon in N3 Tim Serong

Last message date: Wednesday, 28 February 2001 22:22:33 UTC