www-rdf-interest@w3.org from February 2001 by author

Aaron Swartz

• Re: Notes On The F2F (Tuesday, 27 February)
• ANN: RDFnet Newsgroups (Sunday, 25 February)
• Re: Use/misuse of RDF:Value (Friday, 23 February)
• Re: RDFS versioning (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: RDFS versioning (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: RDFS implicitly included? (Thursday, 22 February)
• RDFS term confusion (Thursday, 22 February)
• rdf:property defined by RDFS (Thursday, 22 February)
• RDFS versioning (Thursday, 22 February)
• RDFS typographical issues (Thursday, 22 February)
• clarifying RDFS properties (Thursday, 22 February)
• RDFS terms used in non-schemas (Thursday, 22 February)
• RDFS implicitly included? (Thursday, 22 February)
• Non-namespaced RDF (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: rdf:about, rdf:ID and anonymous resources (Wednesday, 21 February)
• "certain well-structured XML DTDs" (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: Decentralized RDF Distribution (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: Decentralized RDF Distribution (Monday, 19 February)
• Re: Decentralized RDF Distribution (Monday, 19 February)
• Re: Decentralized RDF Distribution (Monday, 19 February)
• Decentralized RDF Distribution (Monday, 19 February)
• Re: What are allowable property URIs? (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: What are allowable property URIs? (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: data: URI and resource (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: What are allowable property URIs? (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: What are allowable property URIs? (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: What are allowable property URIs? (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: Another RDF Syntax Idea (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: Another RDF Syntax Idea (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Another RDF Syntax Idea (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? (Sunday, 11 February)
• Re: Announcement: RDF Representation of Wordnet available for Download (Sunday, 4 February)

Alexander Maedche

• CFP: IJCAI-01 Workshop on Ontology Learning (Friday, 9 February)

Ana Alice Baptista

• [www-rdf-interest] <none> (Wednesday, 28 February)

Antonio Tomarchio

• R: Semantic Web Mining (Friday, 9 February)

Arnold deVos

• Re: Simple extname<->URI-ref hack (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Simple extname<->URI-ref hack (Monday, 12 February)

Art Barstow

• Changes to the W3C's RDF sandbox (Friday, 23 February)

Bernard Vatant

• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? (Monday, 12 February)

Bill de hOra

• RE: RDFS implicitly included? (Thursday, 22 February)
• IHMC concept maps (Wednesday, 21 February)
• RE: Decentralized RDF Distribution (Monday, 19 February)
• RE: Decentralized RDF Distribution (Monday, 19 February)
• RE: Decentralized RDF Distribution (Monday, 19 February)
• RE: Decentralized RDF Distribution (Monday, 19 February)
• RE: Literals and URIs (2) (Friday, 16 February)
• RE: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? (Thursday, 15 February)
• RE: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? (Thursday, 15 February)
• RE: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? (Wednesday, 14 February)
• RE: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? (Tuesday, 13 February)
• RE: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? (Tuesday, 13 February)
• RE: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? (Monday, 12 February)
• RE: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? (Monday, 12 February)
• RE: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? (Monday, 12 February)
• RE: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? (Monday, 12 February)
• RE: About using distances or probabilities (Thursday, 8 February)
• RE: Freenet, distributed search and simple RDF queries (Monday, 5 February)

Bill dehOra

• RE: RDFS versioning (Thursday, 22 February)
• RE: RDFS versioning (Thursday, 22 February)

Brian McBride

• Specifying the Syntax to Model Transformation (Thursday, 22 February)
• syntax issue? (Wednesday, 21 February)

by way of

• FW: Re: Use/misuse of RDF:Value (Thursday, 1 March)
• Int. Workshop on Content-Based Multimedia Indexing-CBMI'2001 (Thursday, 1 March)
• Knowledge and Information Systems: 3(1) and 3(2), 2001 (Tuesday, 27 February)
• CFP: ICTAI 2001 (Wednesday, 21 February)
• cfp: Issues in the Design and Experimental Evaluation of Systems for Modal and Temporal Logics (Friday, 16 February)
• AGENTS FOR E-BUSINESS ON THE INTERNET (Friday, 16 February)
• FOIS-2001 CFP (Tuesday, 13 February)

Charles McCathieNevile

• Queries Re: RDF IG meeting at W3C Technical Plenary 2001-02-28 (fwd) (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: RDF standard for PRIVACY STATUS of a document (Wednesday, 7 February)

Dan Brickley

• Announcement: W3C Launches Semantic Web Activity (fwd) (Sunday, 25 February)
• RDF IG: Face to face meeting 26/27 Feb 2001, Cambridge MA, USA (Saturday, 24 February)
• W3C Semantic Web Activity: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/ (Saturday, 10 February)
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? (Friday, 9 February)
• example: RDF for Web server config (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: [freenet-tech] RE: Freenet, distributed search and simple RDF queries (Sunday, 4 February)
• Re: Announcement: RDF Representation of Wordnet available for Download (Sunday, 4 February)
• RE: Freenet, distributed search and simple RDF queries (Saturday, 3 February)
• Re: Freenet, distributed search and simple RDF queries (Saturday, 3 February)
• RE: RDF IG meeting at W3C Technical Plenary 2001-02-28 (Saturday, 3 February)
• Freenet, distributed search and simple RDF queries (Saturday, 3 February)

Dan Connolly

• RDF Syntax: An XML Schema Approach (Thursday, 22 February)
• RDF:Seq: no way to say "that's all, folks!" (Thursday, 22 February)
• goofy usage of rdfs:domain in infoset.rdf? (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? (Wednesday, 7 February)

Danny Ayers

• RE: [redland] Redland News 2000-02-21 (Thursday, 22 February)
• RE: RDFS versioning (Thursday, 22 February)
• RE: RDFS term confusion (Thursday, 22 February)
• RE: Decentralized RDF Distribution (Tuesday, 20 February)
• RE: Decentralized RDF Distribution (Tuesday, 20 February)
• RE: Decentralized RDF Distribution (Monday, 19 February)
• RE: Decentralized RDF Distribution (Monday, 19 February)
• RE: Decentralized RDF Distribution (Monday, 19 February)
• RE: Decentralized RDF Distribution (Monday, 19 February)
• RE: Where should you look for metadata? (Friday, 16 February)

Dave Beckett

• The Design and Implementation of the Redland RDF Application Framework (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: Another RDF Syntax Idea (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: Another RDF Syntax Idea (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? (Thursday, 8 February)
• ANNOUNCEMENT: Redland RDF Application Framework 0.9.8 (Monday, 5 February)

David Allsopp

• Re: IHMC concept maps (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: Decentralized RDF Distribution (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: Decentralized RDF Distribution (Monday, 19 February)
• Re: RDF IG meeting at W3C Technical Plenary 2001-02-28 (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: RDF IG meeting at W3C Technical Plenary 2001-02-28 (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: RDF IG meeting at W3C Technical Plenary 2001-02-28 (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: About using distances or probabilities (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: About using distances or probabilities (Thursday, 8 February)

David Li

• JAXP patch for RDFAPI... (Monday, 19 February)

David Megginson

• Where should you look for metadata? (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? (Thursday, 8 February)
• re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? (Thursday, 8 February)

Dorn Alexander

• Re: RDF standard for PRIVACY STATUS of a document (Wednesday, 7 February)
• RDF standard for PRIVACY STATUS of a document (Tuesday, 6 February)

Frank Manola

• Re: Decentralized RDF Distribution (Monday, 19 February)

Frank V. Castellucci

• Re: IHMC concept maps (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: IHMC concept maps (Wednesday, 21 February)

Gabe Beged-Dov

• Re: What are allowable property URIs? (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: What are allowable property URIs? (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? (Friday, 9 February)

Geoff Chappell

• ANNOUNCE: RDF Gateway v.0.1 technology release (Thursday, 22 February)

George Michael Pearson

• Re: Semantic Web Mining (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: Semantic Web Mining (Monday, 12 February)

Gerd Stumme

• Semantic Web Mining (Friday, 9 February)

Graham Klyne

• Re: Mapping External Triples Structures Into Your Own Systems (Friday, 23 February)
• RE: What are allowable property URIs? (Thursday, 15 February)
• RE: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? (Thursday, 15 February)
• Literals and URIs (1) (Thursday, 15 February)
• data: URI and resource (Thursday, 15 February)
• Literals and URIs (2) (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? (Wednesday, 14 February)
• What are allowable property URIs? (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Namespaces and fragments (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: RDF standard for PRIVACY STATUS of a document (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? (Thursday, 8 February)
• RE: Containers (Friday, 2 February)
• Fwd: Containers (Thursday, 1 February)

Hans-Georg Stork

• IST Action Line 'Semantic Web Technologies' and OpenHouseEvent in Luxembourg (Wednesday, 28 February)

harmeet singh lamba

• About using distances or probabilities (Wednesday, 7 February)

Henry S. Thompson

• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? (Monday, 12 February)

Hugo Haas

• Call for Participation: W3C Workshop on Web services (Saturday, 3 February)

Johan Hjelm

• Re: [freenet-tech] RE: Freenet, distributed search and simple RDF queries (Monday, 5 February)

Jonas Liljegren

• ANNOUNCE: RDF::Service 0.0404 (Friday, 2 February)

Jonathan Borden

• Re: What are allowable property URIs? (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: What are allowable property URIs? (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: What are allowable property URIs? (Thursday, 15 February)
• RE: What are allowable property URIs? (Thursday, 15 February)
• Metathesaurus issues. was: Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? (Tuesday, 13 February)
• RE: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? (Monday, 12 February)
• RE: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? (Thursday, 8 February)
• RE: Containers (Sunday, 4 February)
• RE: Containers (Sunday, 4 February)
• RE: RDF IG meeting at W3C Technical Plenary 2001-02-28 (Saturday, 3 February)

jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com

• Re: Metathesaurus issues. was: Re: does RDF require understandin (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: Practical N3/SW Uses (Friday, 2 February)
• Re: Dropping the redundant colon in N3 (Thursday, 1 February)

Joshua Allen

• RE: SWAG: What should the SWAG dictionary include? (Wednesday, 28 February)
• RE: Decentralized RDF Distribution (Monday, 19 February)
• RE: Freenet, distributed search and simple RDF queries (Saturday, 3 February)

lagoze@cs.cornell.edu

• Use/misuse of RDF:Value (Friday, 23 February)

Leigh Dodds

• RE: Mapping External Triples Structures Into Your Own Systems (Friday, 23 February)

Libby Miller

• Re: Decentralized RDF Distribution (Monday, 19 February)

Mark Grossman

• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? (Monday, 12 February)

Mark Nottingham

• Re: RDF standard for PRIVACY STATUS of a document (Wednesday, 7 February)

Martin Duerst

• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? (Tuesday, 13 February)

McBride, Brian

• RE: Slim RDF (Tuesday, 20 February)
• RE: Slim RDF (Monday, 19 February)
• RE: What are allowable property URIs? (Thursday, 15 February)
• RE: About using distances or probabilities (Monday, 12 February)
• RE: Self introduction of Michel Biezunski and Steven R. Newcomb (Wednesday, 7 February)
• RE: Containers (Sunday, 4 February)
• RE: Containers (Friday, 2 February)
• RE: Containers (Friday, 2 February)

Michael Kifer

• XSB 2.3 (Friday, 23 February)

Michel Biezunski

• RE: Self introduction of Michel Biezunski and Steven R. Newcomb (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Self introduction of Michel Biezunski and Steven R. Newcomb (Wednesday, 7 February)

Mike Dierken

• RE: [syndication] ANN: RDFnet Newsgroups (Monday, 26 February)
• RE: [syndication] ANN: RDFnet Newsgroups (Monday, 26 February)
• RE: [syndication] ANN: RDFnet Newsgroups (Monday, 26 February)

Peter F. Patel-Schneider

• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? (Monday, 12 February)
• does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? (Wednesday, 7 February)

Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN

• Re: Slim RDF (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: Slim RDF (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? (Monday, 12 February)

raghuram

• Re: FW: Cursors face defining moments on the Web (Friday, 2 February)

Ralph R. Swick

• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? (Monday, 12 February)

Roland Schwaenzl

• re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? (Thursday, 8 February)

Ross Judson

• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: Slim RDF (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? (Monday, 12 February)

Sean B. Palmer

• Re: SWAG: What should the SWAG dictionary include? (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: Notes On The F2F (Monday, 26 February)
• Notes On The F2F (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: Mapping External Triples Structures Into Your Own Systems (Friday, 23 February)
• Mapping External Triples Structures Into Your Own Systems (Friday, 23 February)
• Article: SW = ( SM + SC ) (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: RDFS versioning (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: Semantic Memories, and other SW developments (Thursday, 22 February)
• Semantic Memories, and other SW developments (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: Decentralized RDF Distribution (Monday, 19 February)
• Re: Where should you look for metadata? (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? (Monday, 12 February)

Sergey Melnik

• Re: Slim RDF (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: Slim RDF (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: Slim RDF (Monday, 19 February)
• Slim RDF (Monday, 12 February)

Seth Russell

• [www-rdf-interest] <none> (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: SWAG: What should the SWAG dictionary include? (Wednesday, 28 February)
• If you want a coherent experience of the semantic web, you need personal semantic memory. (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: Notes On The F2F (Monday, 26 February)
• Model enthusiasts may be interested in this. (Sunday, 25 February)
• Re: Semantic Memories, and other SW developments (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: IHMC concept maps (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: Semantic Memories, and other SW developments (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: [redland] Redland News 2000-02-21 (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: IHMC concept maps (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: IHMC concept maps (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: Decentralized RDF Distribution (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: Decentralized RDF Distribution (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: Decentralized RDF Distribution (Monday, 19 February)
• Re: Decentralized RDF Distribution (Monday, 19 February)
• Re: Decentralized RDF Distribution (Monday, 19 February)
• Re: Decentralized RDF Distribution (Monday, 19 February)
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes? (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: RDF IG meeting at W3C Technical Plenary 2001-02-28 (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: RDF IG meeting at W3C Technical Plenary 2001-02-28 (Saturday, 10 February)
• Re: About using distances or probabilities (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: About using distances or probabilities (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: About using distances or probabilities (Wednesday, 7 February)

Siegfried Handschuh

• Announcement: RDF Crawler available for Download (Friday, 9 February)

ssarkar@ayushnet.com

• RE: Decentralized RDF Distribution (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: Decentralized RDF Distribution (Tuesday, 20 February)

Stefan Decker

• Announcement: RDF Representation of Wordnet available for Download (Friday, 2 February)

Tim Berners-Lee

• Re: Dropping the redundant colon in N3 (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: Quotes in N3 (Thursday, 1 February)

Tim Serong

• RE: Dropping the redundant colon in N3 (Thursday, 1 February)

Uche Ogbuji

• ANN: 4Suite and 4Suite Server 0.10.2 (Monday, 19 February)

William Loughborough

• Re: Freenet, distributed search and simple RDF queries (Saturday, 3 February)

Last message date: Wednesday, 28 February 2001 22:22:33 UTC