- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 19:18:24 -0500 (EST)
- To: Dorn Alexander <office@dorn-software.com>
- cc: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
How does the P3P work match up with what you are looking at? I believe that they are intersted mostly in client-server transactions about privacy (or vice cersa) but presumably their vocabulary is along similar lines and extensible. http://www.w3.org/P3P (I have to admit I haven't gone very deeply into it). Cheers Charles McCN On Tue, 6 Feb 2001, Dorn Alexander wrote: [freed from spam trap -ralph] Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 04:33:00 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <01f201c09020$7c356080$d301a8c0@hub.iwy.com> From: "Dorn Alexander" <office@dorn-software.com> To: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org> Since I am working on a thesis defining EPR (Electronic Patient Record) in XML one of the major concerns in automatically linking medical documents is the automated recognition of the privacy status of a document. A RDF definition, which would should standardized, defining the status of the document (e.g. invisible=only visible for the owner, private = existence visible, content invisible, group, all ) would advise any program dealing with the data, how to treat it. I am wondering that I couldn't find any similar definition, so maybe somebody could give me a hint where I could find something like that or when/whether some similar features will be defined in future standards. Thank's for an answer Alexander Dorn -- Charles McCathieNevile http://www.w3.org/People/Charles phone: +61 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI fax: +1 617 258 5999 Location: I-cubed, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton VIC 3053, Australia (or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)
Received on Tuesday, 6 February 2001 19:18:26 UTC