- From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 10:03:40 +0000
- To: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@swartzfam.com>
- Cc: RDF interest group <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
At 08:00 PM 2/14/01 -0600, Aaron Swartz wrote: >Data URIs don't refer to resources -- they simply are the resources that one >would normally expect a URI to refer to. Therefore, I don't think data: URIs >need to be explicitly excluded since they do happen to be resources, just >different than what we'd normally expect. I think it's flawed to say a data: URI *is* the resource. RFC2396 describes a resource as a conceptual mapping from a URI to one or more entities. A data: URI describes and embodies that mapping, and as such it is a self contained description of the resource, but that is not the same as _being_ the resource. #g ------------ Graham Klyne GK@NineByNine.org
Received on Thursday, 15 February 2001 05:11:51 UTC