- From: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@swartzfam.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 13:22:14 -0600
- To: Danny Ayers <danny@panlanka.net>, RDF Interest <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Danny Ayers <danny@panlanka.net> wrote: > So the inference mechanism would be centralised? If so then I suppose the > problem here boils down to propagating the updates in a way that maintains > the transaction idea. The effects that (potentially) lead to infinite loops > could be a devil to calm (a distributed inference system could cause the > same problems) - though as you seem to be swuggesting, one step at a time... Whoa there -- we don't have to worry about inference yet. Let's just try and get the data to move. Inference can be done locally, and not thrown back into the stream to prevent looping. > BTW, were you thinking of hacking the inference mechanism together or using > an existing tool/shell (e.g. Jess)? Hacking. -- [ Aaron Swartz | me@aaronsw.com | http://www.aaronsw.com ]
Received on Tuesday, 20 February 2001 14:22:33 UTC