- From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 09:05:46 -0500
- To: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Sean B. Palmer writes: > > If I want to find the truth about: http://republicans.org/GeorgeW > > I don't think I'd choose that URI as the most reliable source. > > You're saying there that you wouldn't choose that URI as a reliable > source for information about a *person*, not that URI. Surely you > agree that the best place to find out something about > http://republicans.org/GeorgeW would be > http://republicans.org/GeorgeW ? Think of the kinds of questions that you might ask about a Web site overall or about a specific page: 1. What is the subject matter of the page? 2. Is it suitable for the young or easily-offended? 3. Is its content free, or does it require payment? 4. Does the owner share any cookies or other personal information with other parties? 5. How highly have users rated the content? I wouldn't trust even top-50 Web sites to answer #4 or #5 honestly (as a matter of fact, I'd bet on their lying), and outside of big, well-known sites with a lot to lose in a court action, I wouldn't put much faith in the answers to #1, #2, or #3 either. I might look at the site's own metadata as a desperate last resort, but I'd always try a trusted third party (such as a Web auditing company) first. Ask a search-engine author about how reliable self-reporting is (pay particular attention to how sites use keywords). All the best, David -- David Megginson david@megginson.com http://www.megginson.com/
Received on Friday, 16 February 2001 09:07:53 UTC