Notes On The F2F

Quoting from [1]:-
> Graham Klyne Scope creep, is adding N3 spec too much?
> JdR: There's already something in the spec -- little example
formats.
> GK: Oh.
> TimBL: We can charter another group for it.

I (obviously) support that move... But it would be nice to have a
group looking into how triples structures are represented, not only in
plain text (such as N3 and semEnglish) but possibly in XML, XHTML, and
SGML too. If the SW is to be interoperable, there needs to be
guidelines / advices / practises on creating RDF based syntaxes. Thus,
such a group could be looking at not only producing alternate syntaxes
for RDF such as furthering the excellent work done on Notation3, but
also on guidelines for creating your own, such as Seth likes to do
<grin/>

[1] http://logicerror.com/w3c-meeting-2001-2 Thanks Aaron; apologies
for not being there is person to rant about this... maybe it's for the
best! Aaron provides the caveat that these notes may not be accurate.

--
Kindest Regards,
Sean B. Palmer
@prefix : <http://webns.net/roughterms/> .
[ :name "Sean B. Palmer" ] :hasHomepage <http://infomesh.net/sbp/> .

Received on Monday, 26 February 2001 12:40:38 UTC