public-prov-wg@w3.org from March 2013 by author

Curt Tilmes

• FAQ: "Can I infer Derivation from Usage and Generation?" (Thursday, 21 March)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-650: dictionary insertion, with or without id/attrs? [PROV-DICTIONARY] (Thursday, 14 March)
• Re: staging: prov-aq, prov-xml and prov-overview (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: staging: prov-aq, prov-xml and prov-overview (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: staging: prov-aq, prov-xml and prov-overview (Monday, 4 March)

Daniel Garijo

• Prov-DC ready for review (Friday, 29 March)
• Re: dublin core to prov blog post up (Friday, 29 March)
• Re: prov-wg Telcon Agenda March 27, 2013 (Wednesday, 27 March)
• Re: provenance working group teleconference agenda: March 21, 2013 (Thursday, 21 March)
• Re: congratulations to provenance working group (Friday, 8 March)
• Re: dc-prov note working draft staged (Monday, 4 March)
• dc-prov note working draft staged (Monday, 4 March)

Graham Klyne

• Re: prov-links ready for review (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: prov-links ready for review (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: Requesting reviews of Provenance Access and Query document. (Wednesday, 27 March)
• Re: Requesting reviews of Provenance Access and Query document. (Wednesday, 27 March)
• Re: [PROV-AQ] Editors' working copy updated (Tuesday, 26 March)
• [PROV-AQ] Editors' working copy updated (Monday, 25 March)
• Re: provenance working group teleconference agenda: March 21, 2013 (Wednesday, 20 March)
• Proposed response to PROV-AQ comments from James Anderson (updated) (Wednesday, 20 March)
• Re: prov-overview - call for suggestions (Monday, 18 March)
• [PROV-AQ] Response to James Anderson (Thursday, 14 March)
• Requesting reviews of Provenance Access and Query document. (Thursday, 14 March)
• [PROV-AQ] Fwd: RFC 6892 on The 'describes' Link Relation Type (Thursday, 14 March)
• Fwd: Tracking media-type registration requests (Wednesday, 13 March)
• Re: [PROV-AQ] ISSUE-618: Should pingback be described in PROV-AQ? (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Proposed response to PROV-AQ comments from James Anderson (updated) (Monday, 11 March)
• Proposed response to PROV-AQ comments from James Anderson (Monday, 11 March)
• [PROV-AQ] ISSUE-618: Should pingback be described in PROV-AQ? (Monday, 11 March)
• [PROV-AQ] ISSUE-632: Should PROV-AQ be renamed (Monday, 11 March)
• [PROV-AQ] ISSUE-428: should we recommend RDF for provenance; define other mimetypes for other serializations? (Monday, 11 March)
• PROV-AQ issues pending review (Monday, 11 March)
• PROV-AQ responses to Stian's review (part 1) (Monday, 11 March)
• PROV-AQ responses to Luc's review (Monday, 11 March)
• PROV-AQ responses to Tim's review (Monday, 11 March)
• PROV-AQ responses to Simon's review (Monday, 11 March)
• PROV-AQ response to Ivan's review (Monday, 11 March)
• PROV-AQ responses to Dong's review (Monday, 11 March)
• PROV-AQ responses to Stian's review (part 2) (Monday, 11 March)
• Proposed timetable for PROV-AQ completion (Monday, 11 March)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-636 (PROV-DC has provenance): Include has_provenance in PROV-DC (Monday, 4 March)

Hua, Hook (388C)

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-648: Can schema be made a bit more jaxb friendly? [XML Serialization] (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-648: Can schema be made a bit more jaxb friendly? [XML Serialization] (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-648: Can schema be made a bit more jaxb friendly? [XML Serialization] (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-648: Can schema be made a bit more jaxb friendly? [XML Serialization] (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-648: Can schema be made a bit more jaxb friendly? [XML Serialization] (Thursday, 21 March)

Huynh T.D.

• RE: PROV-AQ responses to Dong's review (Monday, 11 March)

Ivan Herman

• Fwd: [IANA #660606] Request for MIME media type Text/Standards Tree - provenance-notation (Thursday, 14 March)
• Re: [PROV-AQ] ISSUE-618: Should pingback be described in PROV-AQ? (Wednesday, 13 March)
• Re: PROV-AQ response to Ivan's review (Monday, 11 March)
• Chaos ahead (for Europeans): DST starts the coming week-end in the US (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: paq embedded provenance (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: paq embedded provenance (Tuesday, 5 March)

James Cheney

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-638 (TomDN): Notation of set of key-value pairs in contraints of PROV Dictionary [PROV-DICTIONARY] (Tuesday, 26 March)
• Re: provenance working group teleconference agenda: March 21, 2013 (Thursday, 21 March)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-579 (declarative-fol-specification): Suggestion to replace procedural specification with (equivalent, but shorter and less prescriptive) declarative theory in First-Order Logic [prov-dm-constraints] (Friday, 8 March)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-635 (prov-sem-completeness): Completeness and scope of prov-sem [Formal Semantics] (Friday, 8 March)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-630 (prov-sem-fpwd-review): PROV-SEM review for FPWD [Formal Semantics] (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: Semantics staged (Monday, 4 March)
• Semantics staged (Sunday, 3 March)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-630 (prov-sem-fpwd-review): PROV-SEM review for FPWD [Formal Semantics] (Saturday, 2 March)

Jim McCusker

• Re: [PROV-AQ] ISSUE-428: should we recommend RDF for provenance; define other mimetypes for other serializations? (Tuesday, 12 March)

Jun Zhao

• Re: Feedback to the LC of the Organization Ontology from the Prov WG (Friday, 22 March)

Khalid Belhajjame

• Re: FAQ entry on influence/inform (ISSUE-592) (Friday, 29 March)
• Re: provenance working group teleconference agenda: March 21, 2013 (Thursday, 21 March)
• PROV Dictionary (Friday, 8 March)
• Re: congratulations to provenance working group (Friday, 8 March)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-630 (prov-sem-fpwd-review): PROV-SEM review for FPWD [Formal Semantics] (Saturday, 2 March)

Luc Moreau

• Re: Changes to PROV-N grammar of PROV-Dictionary (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-648: Can schema be made a bit more jaxb friendly? [XML Serialization] (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-648: Can schema be made a bit more jaxb friendly? [XML Serialization] (Thursday, 28 March)
• Minutes of 28 March 2013 Provenance Working Teleconference (Thursday, 28 March)
• prov-links ready for review (Thursday, 28 March)
• new sotd paragraph and provbib.js (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-647 (TomDN): Make prov:pariValue a subproperty of prov:entity? [PROV-DICTIONARY] (Monday, 25 March)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-647 (TomDN): Make prov:pariValue a subproperty of prov:entity? [PROV-DICTIONARY] (Monday, 25 March)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-647 (TomDN): Make prov:pariValue a subproperty of prov:entity? [PROV-DICTIONARY] (Monday, 25 March)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-643 (TomDN): Include additional constraint hadMember implies hadDictionaryMember with unknown key [PROV-DICTIONARY] (Monday, 25 March)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-641 (TomDN): Should qualifiedInsertion/Removal imply qualifiedDerivation? [PROV-DICTIONARY] (Monday, 25 March)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-639 (TomDN): Notation of hadDictionaryMember [PROV-DICTIONARY] (Monday, 25 March)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-650: dictionary insertion, with or without id/attrs? [PROV-DICTIONARY] (Monday, 25 March)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-640 (TomDN): Namespace and prefix in PROV Dictionary [PROV-DICTIONARY] (Friday, 22 March)
• minutes of today's provenance teleconference (Thursday, 21 March)
• today's call: scribe needed, please (Thursday, 21 March)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-648: Can schema be made a bit more jaxb friendly? [XML Serialization] (Thursday, 21 March)
• ACTION-122 is complete (Thursday, 21 March)
• provenance working group teleconference agenda: March 21, 2013 (Wednesday, 20 March)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-650: dictionary insertion, with or without id/attrs? [PROV-DICTIONARY] (Thursday, 14 March)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-651: 3 comments on prov-o (wasDerived, wasAttrib, actedOnBehalf) (Thursday, 14 March)
• Fwd: Re: Publication request for 13 PROV Documents (March 12) (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: [PROV-AQ] ISSUE-618: Should pingback be described in PROV-AQ? (Monday, 11 March)
• Re: [PROV-AQ] ISSUE-428: should we recommend RDF for provenance; define other mimetypes for other serializations? (Monday, 11 March)
• Re: Proposed response to PROV-AQ comments from James Anderson (Monday, 11 March)
• congratulations to provenance working group (Friday, 8 March)
• Important: workplan till publication date (Thursday, 7 March)
• Provenance Working Group Teleconference: Minutes of 07 March 2013 (Thursday, 7 March)
• Re: staging: prov-aq, prov-xml and prov-overview (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: staging: prov-aq, prov-xml and prov-overview (Monday, 4 March)
• staging: prov-aq, prov-xml and prov-overview (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: dc-prov note working draft staged (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: Primer staged (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: Fwd: Fwd: [IANA #660606] Request for MIME media type Text/Standards Tree - provenance-notation (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: Primer staged (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: dc-prov note working draft staged (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: dc-prov note working draft staged (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: review of prov-xml (Friday, 1 March)
• Re: review of prov-xml (Friday, 1 March)
• Re: review of prov-xml (Friday, 1 March)

Miles, Simon

• RE: Internal Review Prov Dictionary (Friday, 29 March)
• Primer staged ready for review (Friday, 29 March)
• FAQ entry on influence/inform (ISSUE-592) (Wednesday, 27 March)
• Primer issue closed (Wednesday, 20 March)
• RE: provenance working group teleconference agenda: March 21, 2013 (Wednesday, 20 March)
• RE: PROV-ISSUE-651: 3 comments on prov-o (wasDerived, wasAttrib, actedOnBehalf) (Thursday, 14 March)
• RE: [PROV-AQ] ISSUE-618: Should pingback be described in PROV-AQ? (Wednesday, 13 March)
• RE: PROV-AQ responses to Simon's review (Monday, 11 March)
• RE: congratulations to provenance working group (Friday, 8 March)
• RE: prov-wg Minutes of the Feb. 28, 2013 Telcon (Thursday, 7 March)
• FW: Chaos ahead (for Europeans): DST starts the coming week-end in the US (Tuesday, 5 March)
• RE: Primer staged (Monday, 4 March)
• Primer staged (Friday, 1 March)
• FW: The wasQuotedFrom relationship (Friday, 1 March)

Paolo Missier

• Re: congratulations to provenance working group (Friday, 8 March)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-638 (TomDN): Notation of set of key-value pairs in contraints of PROV Dictionary [PROV-DICTIONARY] (Thursday, 7 March)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-639 (TomDN): Notation of hadDictionaryMember [PROV-DICTIONARY] (Thursday, 7 March)

Paul Groth

• Re: PROV-AQ blog post (Friday, 29 March)
• Re: FAQ entry on influence/inform (ISSUE-592) (Friday, 29 March)
• dublin core to prov blog post up (Friday, 29 March)
• prov-wg Telcon Agenda March 27, 2013 (Wednesday, 27 March)
• blog post on our last release of prov (Thursday, 21 March)
• prov-wg Telcon Minutes March 14, 2013 (Monday, 18 March)
• prov-overview - call for suggestions (Sunday, 17 March)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-651: 3 comments on prov-o (wasDerived, wasAttrib, actedOnBehalf) (Thursday, 14 March)
• prov-wg telcon - Important time change for Europeans (1 hour earlier!) (Thursday, 14 March)
• prov-wg Telcon Agenda March 14, 2013 (Wednesday, 13 March)
• Re: [PROV-AQ] ISSUE-428: should we recommend RDF for provenance; define other mimetypes for other serializations? (Wednesday, 13 March)
• Re: [PROV-AQ] ISSUE-618: Should pingback be described in PROV-AQ? (Wednesday, 13 March)
• prov-wg: core paq issues - please think/discuss before telcon (Wednesday, 13 March)
• Re: typo in the #alternateOf example? (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: [PROV-AQ] ISSUE-428: should we recommend RDF for provenance; define other mimetypes for other serializations? (Monday, 11 March)
• Re: Proposed response to PROV-AQ comments from James Anderson (Monday, 11 March)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-635 (prov-sem-completeness): Completeness and scope of prov-sem [Formal Semantics] (Sunday, 10 March)
• Re: congratulations to provenance working group (Friday, 8 March)
• Re: prov-wg Minutes of the Feb. 28, 2013 Telcon (Thursday, 7 March)
• prov-wg Minutes of the Feb. 28, 2013 Telcon (Thursday, 7 March)
• Fwd: [Pubrules] HTML5 ok for Recommendations (Wednesday, 6 March)
• Re: paq embedded provenance (Tuesday, 5 March)
• paq embedded provenance (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: staging: prov-aq, prov-xml and prov-overview (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: staging: prov-aq, prov-xml and prov-overview (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: staging: prov-aq, prov-xml and prov-overview (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: staging: prov-aq, prov-xml and prov-overview (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: staging: prov-aq, prov-xml and prov-overview (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: FW: The wasQuotedFrom relationship (Friday, 1 March)

Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker

• PROV-ISSUE-655 (overview-ducharme): Various comments on Overview from Bob DuCharme [PROV-OVERVIEW] (Tuesday, 26 March)
• PROV-ISSUE-654 (primer-ducharme): Various clarifications and comments (Bob DuCharme) [Primer] (Tuesday, 26 March)
• PROV-ISSUE-653: typo in example [prov-dm] (Monday, 25 March)
• PROV-ISSUE-652 (final-revision-actions): Actions for final review period [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Thursday, 14 March)
• PROV-ISSUE-651: 3 comments on prov-o (wasDerived, wasAttrib, actedOnBehalf) (Thursday, 14 March)
• PROV-ISSUE-650: dictionary insertion, with or without id/attrs? [PROV-DICTIONARY] (Wednesday, 13 March)
• PROV-ISSUE-649: typo in alternateOf example. [PROV-O HTML] (Tuesday, 12 March)
• PROV-ISSUE-648: Can schema be made a bit more jaxb friendly? [XML Serialization] (Friday, 8 March)
• PROV-ISSUE-647 (TomDN): Make prov:pariValue a subproperty of prov:entity? [PROV-DICTIONARY] (Thursday, 7 March)
• PROV-ISSUE-646 (TomDN): (Editorial) Layout of the document (and specifically Section 4) [PROV-DICTIONARY] (Thursday, 7 March)
• PROV-ISSUE-645 (TomDN): Should we add a new constraint on EmptyCollection and Dictionary? [PROV-DICTIONARY] (Thursday, 7 March)
• PROV-ISSUE-644 (TomDN): (Editorial) Make sure production rules in grammar are regular text instead of CSS [PROV-DICTIONARY] (Thursday, 7 March)
• PROV-ISSUE-643 (TomDN): Include additional constraint hadMember implies hadDictionaryMember with unknown key [PROV-DICTIONARY] (Thursday, 7 March)
• PROV-ISSUE-642 (TomDN): Include example of provenance of a dictionary in the document [PROV-DICTIONARY] (Thursday, 7 March)
• PROV-ISSUE-641 (TomDN): Should qualifiedInsertion/Removal imply qualifiedDerivation? [PROV-DICTIONARY] (Thursday, 7 March)
• PROV-ISSUE-640 (TomDN): Namespace and prefix in PROV Dictionary [PROV-DICTIONARY] (Thursday, 7 March)
• PROV-ISSUE-639 (TomDN): Notation of hadDictionaryMember [PROV-DICTIONARY] (Thursday, 7 March)
• PROV-ISSUE-638 (TomDN): Notation of set of key-value pairs in contraints of PROV Dictionary [PROV-DICTIONARY] (Thursday, 7 March)
• PROV-ISSUE-637 (resolve dct:references): Discuss dct:references [Mapping PROV-O to Dublin Core] (Monday, 4 March)
• PROV-ISSUE-636 (PROV-DC has provenance): Include has_provenance in PROV-DC (Sunday, 3 March)
• PROV-ISSUE-635 (prov-sem-completeness): Completeness and scope of prov-sem [Formal Semantics] (Friday, 1 March)

Sam Coppens Ugent

• Internal Review Prov Dictionary (Friday, 29 March)

Stephan Zednik

• Re: Changes to PROV-Dictionary XML schema (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: Changes to PROV-Dictionary XML schema (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-648: Can schema be made a bit more jaxb friendly? [XML Serialization] (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-648: Can schema be made a bit more jaxb friendly? [XML Serialization] (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-648: Can schema be made a bit more jaxb friendly? [XML Serialization] (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-648: Can schema be made a bit more jaxb friendly? [XML Serialization] (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-648: Can schema be made a bit more jaxb friendly? [XML Serialization] (Thursday, 21 March)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-650: dictionary insertion, with or without id/attrs? [PROV-DICTIONARY] (Thursday, 14 March)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-650: dictionary insertion, with or without id/attrs? [PROV-DICTIONARY] (Thursday, 14 March)
• Re: staging: prov-aq, prov-xml and prov-overview (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: ISSUE-595: Prov-xml subtyping needs to be marked in the document (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: staging: prov-aq, prov-xml and prov-overview (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: staging: prov-aq, prov-xml and prov-overview (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: ISSUE-595: Prov-xml subtyping needs to be marked in the document (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: staging: prov-aq, prov-xml and prov-overview (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: staging: prov-aq, prov-xml and prov-overview (Monday, 4 March)

Stian Soiland-Reyes

• PROV-AQ blog post (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: ACTION-122 is complete (Monday, 25 March)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-640 (TomDN): Namespace and prefix in PROV Dictionary [PROV-DICTIONARY] (Monday, 25 March)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-643 (TomDN): Include additional constraint hadMember implies hadDictionaryMember with unknown key [PROV-DICTIONARY] (Monday, 25 March)
• Re: [PROV-AQ] Response to James Anderson (Wednesday, 20 March)
• Re: [IANA #660606] Request for MIME media type Text/Standards Tree - provenance-notation (Thursday, 14 March)
• Re: [PROV-AQ] ISSUE-618: Should pingback be described in PROV-AQ? (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: PROV-AQ responses to Stian's review (part 2) (Monday, 11 March)
• Re: PROV-AQ responses to Stian's review (part 1) (Monday, 11 March)
• PROV-implementations missing submissions! (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: ISSUE-595: Prov-xml subtyping needs to be marked in the document (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: review of prov-xml (Friday, 1 March)
• Re: review of prov-xml (Friday, 1 March)

Timothy Lebo

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-647 (TomDN): Make prov:pariValue a subproperty of prov:entity? [PROV-DICTIONARY] (Monday, 25 March)
• Re: prov-overview - call for suggestions (Monday, 18 March)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-651: 3 comments on prov-o (wasDerived, wasAttrib, actedOnBehalf) (Thursday, 14 March)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-651: 3 comments on prov-o (wasDerived, wasAttrib, actedOnBehalf) (Thursday, 14 March)
• Re: Three comments (Thursday, 14 March)
• Re: typo in the #alternateOf example? (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: typo in the #alternateOf example? (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: typo in the #alternateOf example? (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: [PROV-AQ] ISSUE-618: Should pingback be described in PROV-AQ? (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: PROV-AQ responses to Tim's review (Monday, 11 March)

Tom De Nies

• Re: Internal Review Prov Dictionary (Saturday, 30 March)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-643 (TomDN): Include additional constraint hadMember implies hadDictionaryMember with unknown key [PROV-DICTIONARY] (Thursday, 28 March)
• Changes to PROV-N grammar of PROV-Dictionary (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-650: dictionary insertion, with or without id/attrs? [PROV-DICTIONARY] (Thursday, 28 March)
• Changes to PROV-Dictionary XML schema (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-640 (TomDN): Namespace and prefix in PROV Dictionary [PROV-DICTIONARY] (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-645 (TomDN): Should we add a new constraint on EmptyCollection and Dictionary? [PROV-DICTIONARY] (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-647 (TomDN): Make prov:pariValue a subproperty of prov:entity? [PROV-DICTIONARY] (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-641 (TomDN): Should qualifiedInsertion/Removal imply qualifiedDerivation? [PROV-DICTIONARY] (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-638 (TomDN): Notation of set of key-value pairs in contraints of PROV Dictionary [PROV-DICTIONARY] (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-639 (TomDN): Notation of hadDictionaryMember [PROV-DICTIONARY] (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-638 (TomDN): Notation of set of key-value pairs in contraints of PROV Dictionary [PROV-DICTIONARY] (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-647 (TomDN): Make prov:pariValue a subproperty of prov:entity? [PROV-DICTIONARY] (Monday, 25 March)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-647 (TomDN): Make prov:pariValue a subproperty of prov:entity? [PROV-DICTIONARY] (Monday, 25 March)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-643 (TomDN): Include additional constraint hadMember implies hadDictionaryMember with unknown key [PROV-DICTIONARY] (Monday, 25 March)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-647 (TomDN): Make prov:pariValue a subproperty of prov:entity? [PROV-DICTIONARY] (Friday, 22 March)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-645 (TomDN): Should we add a new constraint on EmptyCollection and Dictionary? [PROV-DICTIONARY] (Friday, 22 March)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-643 (TomDN): Include additional constraint hadMember implies hadDictionaryMember with unknown key [PROV-DICTIONARY] (Friday, 22 March)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-642 (TomDN): Include example of provenance of a dictionary in the document [PROV-DICTIONARY] (Friday, 22 March)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-642 (TomDN): Include example of provenance of a dictionary in the document [PROV-DICTIONARY] (Friday, 22 March)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-641 (TomDN): Should qualifiedInsertion/Removal imply qualifiedDerivation? [PROV-DICTIONARY] (Friday, 22 March)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-640 (TomDN): Namespace and prefix in PROV Dictionary [PROV-DICTIONARY] (Friday, 22 March)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-639 (TomDN): Notation of hadDictionaryMember [PROV-DICTIONARY] (Friday, 22 March)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-638 (TomDN): Notation of set of key-value pairs in contraints of PROV Dictionary [PROV-DICTIONARY] (Friday, 22 March)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-650: dictionary insertion, with or without id/attrs? [PROV-DICTIONARY] (Thursday, 14 March)
• Re: prov-wg Telcon Agenda March 14, 2013 (Thursday, 14 March)
• Re: prov-dictionary (Monday, 4 March)

Last message date: Saturday, 30 March 2013 11:50:06 UTC