Re: [PROV-AQ] Response to James Anderson

Seems OK to me. Perhaps make it less personal, not so much about what you
did, but us as WG and you(plural) as editors.

-- 
Stian Soiland-Reyes
myGrid team, University of Manchester
http://soiland-reyes.com/stian/work
On 14 Mar 2013 16:52, "Graham Klyne" <graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk> wrote:

> Dear PROV-WG,
>
> I propose to respond to James Anderson's comments on PROV-AQ as outlined
> in the message at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/**
> Public/public-prov-wg/2013Mar/**0103.html<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-prov-wg/2013Mar/0103.html>
> .
>
> If there are any objections or further clarifications called for, please
> could you let me know by next Monday.  Absent objection, I'll send the
> response sometime after then.
>
> #g
> --
>
>

Received on Wednesday, 20 March 2013 10:22:34 UTC