# Re: PROV-ISSUE-642 (TomDN): Include example of provenance of a dictionary in the document [PROV-DICTIONARY]

From: Tom De Nies <tom.denies@ugent.be>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 13:39:46 +0100
Message-ID: <CA+=hbbe4fe=zV5pSYkgtc=-CGxzwEFXSE8a9qzqS_4O+z+7-Ng@mail.gmail.com>
To: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
my apologies, this was for a different issue. Please ignore the previous
email.

2013/3/22 Tom De Nies <tom.denies@ugent.be>

> The editors agree with this comment.
>
> The proposed resolution is to add the constraint
> IF hadMember(d, e) and 'Dictionary' \in typeOf(d) THEN
> hadDictionaryMember(d, e, "k") with k and unknown key
> to PROV-Dictionary.
>
> If any members of the WG have an objection to this, we ask kindly to
> inform us by replying to this email. If no objections are received before
> Tuesday March 26th, we will assume this resolution is accepted,
>
> - Tom
>
>
> 2013/3/7 Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
>
>> PROV-ISSUE-642 (TomDN): Include example of provenance of a dictionary in
>> the document [PROV-DICTIONARY]
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/642
>>
>> Raised by: Tom De Nies
>> On product: PROV-DICTIONARY
>>
>> Originally raised by Paul, who would like to see a small example of the
>> provenance of a dictionary in the document to illustrate the spec. We
>> should do this by the final release.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

Received on Friday, 22 March 2013 12:40:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:51:32 UTC