W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > March 2013

Re: PROV-ISSUE-639 (TomDN): Notation of hadDictionaryMember [PROV-DICTIONARY]

From: Paolo Missier <Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 13:59:44 +0000
Message-ID: <51389D50.3030701@ncl.ac.uk>
To: public-prov-wg@w3.org

I am used to finding keys or key-valu pairs in the third position, which I think is generally the case, so I am happy with the
current notation


On 07/03/2013 10:47, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> PROV-ISSUE-639 (TomDN): Notation of hadDictionaryMember [PROV-DICTIONARY]
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/639
> Raised by: Tom De Nies
> Originally raised by Luc in his review, but agreed to discuss this for the next draft.
> In the notation hadDictionaryMember(d, e0, "k0"), key follows entity, whereas it precedes in derivedByInsertionFrom(d2, d1, {("k1", e3)}). Should this be made uniform? Is it worth the extra effort?

-----------  ~oo~  --------------
Paolo Missier - Paolo.Missier@newcastle.ac.uk, pmissier@acm.org 
School of Computing Science, Newcastle University,  UK
PGP Public key: 0x45596549  - key servers: pool.sks-keyservers.net
Received on Thursday, 7 March 2013 14:00:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:51:32 UTC