- From: Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 15:59:40 +0000
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
+1 On 14/03/2013 15:44, Stephan Zednik wrote: > Do the derivation by insertion and removal support the same set of PROV-defined attributes? > > Assuming that they support prov:label and prov:type and not the other PROV-defined attributes, I would suggest we update the Insertion and Removal complexTypes in the following way. > > The current insertion: > > <!-- Insertion --> > <xs:complexType name="Insertion"> > <xs:sequence> > <xs:element name="newDictionary" type="prov:IDRef"/> > <xs:element name="oldDictionary" type="prov:IDRef"/> > <xs:element name="keyValuePair" type="prov:KeyValuePair" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> > </xs:sequence> > </xs:complexType> > > be changed to: > > <!-- Insertion --> > <xs:complexType name="Insertion"> > <xs:sequence> > <xs:element name="newDictionary" type="prov:IDRef"/> > <xs:element name="oldDictionary" type="prov:IDRef"/> > <xs:element name="keyValuePair" type="prov:KeyValuePair" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> > <!-- prov attributes --> > <xs:element ref="prov:label" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> > <xs:element ref="prov:type" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> > <xs:any namespace="##other" processContents="lax" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> > </xs:sequence> > <xs:attribute ref="prov:id"/> > </xs:complexType> > > The current removal: > > <!-- Removal --> > <xs:complexType name="Removal"> > <xs:sequence> > <xs:element name="newDictionary" type="prov:IDRef"/> > <xs:element name="oldDictionary" type="prov:IDRef"/> > <xs:element name="key" type="xs:anySimpleType" maxOccurs="unbounded" /> > </xs:sequence> > </xs:complexType> > > be changed to: > > <!-- Removal --> > <xs:complexType name="Removal"> > <xs:sequence> > <xs:element name="newDictionary" type="prov:IDRef"/> > <xs:element name="oldDictionary" type="prov:IDRef"/> > <xs:element name="key" type="xs:anySimpleType" maxOccurs="unbounded" /> > <!-- prov attributes --> > <xs:element ref="prov:label" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> > <xs:element ref="prov:type" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> > <xs:any namespace="##other" processContents="lax" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> > </xs:sequence> > <xs:attribute ref="prov:id"/> > </xs:complexType> > > --Stephan > > On Mar 13, 2013, at 9:18 AM, "Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker"<sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote: > > >> PROV-ISSUE-650: dictionary insertion, with or without id/attrs? [PROV-DICTIONARY] >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/650 >> >> Raised by: Luc Moreau >> On product: PROV-DICTIONARY >> >> Hi, >> >> It seems that the prov-n notation for dictionary insertion allows for id and attributes, but the xml schema does not. Ontology contains a qualified Insertion. >> >> So is this a mistake of the schema? >> >> Thanks, >> Luc >> >> >> >> >> > > -- Professor Luc Moreau Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Thursday, 14 March 2013 16:00:17 UTC