Re: [PROV-AQ] Editors' working copy updated

Paul reminded me I was also tasked to revise the wording around provenance 
pingbacks to be less "unidirectional".  I've just pushed a further update.

#g
--

On 25/03/2013 16:23, Graham Klyne wrote:
> Re: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/tip/paq/prov-aq.html
>
> My apologies for not getting this done by last Thursday.  I believe I've
> incorporated all the changes noted at the 2013-03-14 teleconference, and that
> the document is now ready for final WG review.
>
> See also:
>    http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/meeting/2013-03-14
>    http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/products/5
>
> Per original timetable
> (http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/WorkplanTillFinalPublication#prov-aq), I'm
> hoping to have all final comments in by 20130404 (a week Thursday).
>
> #g
> --
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 26 March 2013 21:50:40 UTC