Re: PROV-ISSUE-650: dictionary insertion, with or without id/attrs? [PROV-DICTIONARY] from Curt Tilmes on 2013-03-14 (public-prov-wg@w3.org from March 2013)

From: Curt Tilmes <Curt.Tilmes@nasa.gov>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 12:58:00 -0400
To: Stephan Zednik <zednis@rpi.edu>, Tom De Nies <tom.denies@ugent.be>
CC: Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <51420198.2050602@nasa.gov>

On 3/14/13 12:21 PM, Stephan Zednik wrote:
> I updated my local schema and ran the validation tests 
> in /examples/eg-40-xml-examples-by-term/xml.  Xmllint can successfully 
> parse the schema and all tests in the directory still validate.  I 
> noticed that we don't appear to have any dictionary tests in the 
> examples so my test really only proved we didn't break the schema ;-)
>
> I think as a follow-up we should add examples from PROV-DICTIONARY to 
> /examples/eg-40-xml-examples-by-term/xml.  Tom, can you take the lead 
> on that?
The PROV-DICTIONARY examples are in examples/eg-44-xml-dict  (and 
PROV-LINKS are in examples/eg45-xml-links)

Curt

Received on Thursday, 14 March 2013 16:58:46 UTC