- From: Graham Klyne <graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 10:19:52 +0000
- To: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
- CC: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
On 17/03/2013 11:50, Paul Groth wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm interested in what you think of the current status prov-overview > > http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-overview/ > > Are there any additions, clarifications, etc that you'd like? > > Please let me know, I'd like to do a pass in about two weeks. > > Thanks > Paul > Hi Paul, looks good. Some off-the-cuff notes: Section 1 diagram looks good, but it seems a little odd to me that PROV-N is in there with PROV-DFM and constraints rather than shown beside the serializations. I understand that PROV-N is used by PROV-DM, but at this 50,000-foot level I think it might more usefully be shown as "justy another" serialization. Technically, PROV-O isn't itself a serialization, but a vocabulary that can be serialized as RDF. But maybe it's best to leave that as is, or things get complicated. The statement "At its core is a conceptual data model, which defines a common vocabulary used to describe provenance" seems to be slightly at odds with the classification of PROV-0DM as being for "advanced" users. #g --
Received on Monday, 18 March 2013 10:25:22 UTC