W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > March 2013

Re: prov-overview - call for suggestions

From: Graham Klyne <graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 10:19:52 +0000
Message-ID: <5146EA48.8060702@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
To: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
CC: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>

On 17/03/2013 11:50, Paul Groth wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm interested in what you think of the current status prov-overview
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-overview/
>
> Are there any additions, clarifications, etc that you'd like?
>
> Please let me know, I'd like to do a pass in about two weeks.
>
> Thanks
> Paul
>
Hi Paul, looks good.

Some off-the-cuff notes:

Section 1 diagram looks good, but it seems a little odd to me that PROV-N is in 
there with PROV-DFM and constraints rather than shown beside the 
serializations.  I understand that PROV-N is used by PROV-DM, but at this 
50,000-foot level I think it might more usefully be shown as "justy another" 
serialization.

Technically, PROV-O isn't itself a serialization, but a vocabulary that can be 
serialized as RDF.  But maybe it's best to leave that as is, or things get 
complicated.

The statement "At its core is a conceptual data model, which defines a common 
vocabulary used to describe provenance" seems to be slightly at odds with the 
classification of PROV-0DM as being for "advanced" users.

#g
--
Received on Monday, 18 March 2013 10:25:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:51:32 UTC