- From: Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 10:22:01 +0000
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <EMEW3|f99031d24c640cd08affc1b2cdc7487ap2OAM508l.moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|51502549>
Hi Tom and Tim, If prov:pairValue <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/dictionary/releases/WD-prov-dictionary-20130312/Overview.html#pairValue> is a sub-property of prov:entity <http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/PR-prov-o-20130312/#p_entity>, wouldn't it make prov:KeyValuePair <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/dictionary/releases/WD-prov-dictionary-20130312/Overview.html#KeyValuePair> part of the domain of prov:entity. Given that we do not want to change prov:entity and it should remain prov:EntityInfluence, we could make prov:KeyValuePair a subclass of prov:EntityInfluence, but it looks strange. Tim, what do you think? Luc On 03/22/2013 12:49 PM, Tom De Nies wrote: > Luc raised some concerns about making prov:pairValue a sub-property of > prov:entity in yesterday's telecon. > If we decide to make prov:pairValue > <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/dictionary/releases/WD-prov-dictionary-20130312/Overview.html#pairValue> > a sub-property of prov:entity > <http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/PR-prov-o-20130312/#p_entity>, that would > imply that prov:pairValue now has the domain prov:EntityInfluence > <http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/PR-prov-o-20130312/#EntityInfluence>. > Would this mean that we have to make prov:KeyValuePair > <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/dictionary/releases/WD-prov-dictionary-20130312/Overview.html#KeyValuePair> > a subclass of prov:EntityInfluence > <http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/PR-prov-o-20130312/#EntityInfluence> as > well? This seems weird and counter-intuitive to me. It would imply > that a dictionary would have some influence on all its members. > > Tim, could you share your views on this? > > Regards, > Tom > > 2013/3/7 Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org > <mailto:sysbot+tracker@w3.org>> > > PROV-ISSUE-647 (TomDN): Make prov:pariValue a subproperty of > prov:entity? [PROV-DICTIONARY] > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/647 > > Raised by: Tom De Nies > On product: PROV-DICTIONARY > > Came up in an off-list conversation with Tim about the PROV-O of > dictionaries. It appears to be useful to make prov:pairValue a > subproperty of prov:entity. This way applications could use > spec-level constructs to "accidentally" "understand" part of the > "brand new construct". > > Nice phrasing of the rationale by Tim: > "Having prov:pairValue is a very nice subproperty for these > uninterested in the alignment with qualifications, but still > provides those that do care about qualifications a treat." > > I see no real problems with adding this for the next release. Is > this acceptable to the group or did we miss some consequences? > > > > > -- Professor Luc Moreau Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Monday, 25 March 2013 10:22:30 UTC